Message110324
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, grahamd, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年07月14日.20:03:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00151336 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1279137815.3128.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<AANLkTimY91VkA4vpET-1KEgmz6HG2Q17P61-bi9j5n1H@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> That's why I said we should supply a context decorator (or function) which
> will handle the lock appropriately, taking the name of the module to import
> as an argument so the locking is fine-grained.
Ok, so what are you saying is that we can break compatibility for non
thread-safe import loaders which currently work fine?
(I have nothing against it, just trying to be sure we agree on the
implications) |
|