Message110156
| Author |
rnk |
| Recipients |
gregory.p.smith, hobb0001, jyasskin, pitrou, rnk |
| Date |
2010年07月13日.04:12:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.12133205 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1278994330.64.0.704026802337.issue8844@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Alternatively, do you think it would be better to ignore interrupts when a timeout is passed? If a timeout is passed, the lock acquire will eventually fail in a deadlock situation, and the signal will be handled in the eval loop.
However, if the timeout is sufficiently long, this is still a problem.
I'd prefer to do that or use gettimeofday from _time than leave this as is. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年07月13日 04:12:10 | rnk | set | recipients:
+ rnk, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, jyasskin, hobb0001 |
| 2010年07月13日 04:12:10 | rnk | set | messageid: <1278994330.64.0.704026802337.issue8844@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年07月13日 04:12:08 | rnk | link | issue8844 messages |
| 2010年07月13日 04:12:08 | rnk | create |
|