Message109628
| Author |
giampaolo.rodola |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, doughellmann, giampaolo.rodola, richard |
| Date |
2010年07月08日.22:31:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0038151543 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1278628302.3.0.0795060754488.issue4184@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Would that be acceptable?
I guess it would. Deciding to use that naming convention was a bad design choice in the first place, hence your proposal is perfectly reasonable, in my opinion.
> What additional tests would you deem necessary?
I think that a test which iterates over all renamed attributes and makes sure that DeprecationWarning is raised would be fine.
Also, "__attrname" and "attrname" should be checked for equality. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年07月08日 22:31:42 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, richard, doughellmann, BreamoreBoy |
| 2010年07月08日 22:31:42 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1278628302.3.0.0795060754488.issue4184@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年07月08日 22:31:33 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue4184 messages |
| 2010年07月08日 22:31:33 | giampaolo.rodola | create |
|