Message109619
| Author |
richard |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, doughellmann, giampaolo.rodola, richard |
| Date |
2010年07月08日.22:12:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.03441959 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1278627183.97.0.296412892534.issue4184@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Giampaolo,
I think I can see where you're coming from: assuming that someone else must have also had to resort to the name-mangling hack to extend the class? In that case yes, my patch would break their code. I'll look at re-working it to use properties while retaining the underlying attributes. Would that be acceptable?
What additional tests would you deem necessary? |
|