Message108698
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
drkirkby, mark.dickinson, skrah |
| Date |
2010年06月26日.09:44:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.019556493 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<20100626094428.GA29306@yoda.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1277542573.07.0.777704641367.issue9069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> I don't *think* this is related to issue 7281. I thought we'd determined that that issue
> had nothing to do with copysign itself, and everything to do with what the signbit of the
> NaN returned by float("nan") happens to be.
Yes, that's right. Also, to avoid spreading misinformation: The copysign(1.0, float("nan"))
behavior is actually the same after changing float_repr_style. |
|