Message108645
| Author |
tim.peters |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年06月25日.23:11:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.014891326 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1277507490.09.0.413520823138.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> It would be great if you could shed
> some light on the history behind pure
> python implementation. Why was it
> developed in the first place?
It was rapid prototyping - design decisions were changing daily, and it goes a lot faster to change Python code than C code.
> What was the reason not to ship it
> with python?
Didn't want to create new ongoing maintenance burdens. Multiple implementations eventually drift out of synch, and at the time we had had enough of that already wrt, e.g., pickle vs cPickle.
Sorry, nothing deep here ;-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年06月25日 23:11:30 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, lemburg, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010年06月25日 23:11:30 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1277507490.09.0.413520823138.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年06月25日 23:11:20 | tim.peters | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010年06月25日 23:11:19 | tim.peters | create |
|