Message108544
| Author |
drkirkby |
| Recipients |
drkirkby, mark.dickinson |
| Date |
2010年06月24日.19:07:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.007886933 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1277406447.47.0.653170173651.issue9069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Just to clarify something, in case you notice something does not look quite right.
The link I provided to the build failure on the SPARC machine
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9297
was a Sun Blade 1000. It is *not* the same machine from which I just copied the output, which was a Sun Blade 2000. The two machines are pretty similar though - the motherboards, processors, disks, RAM are interchangeable. In fact,'uname' shows Sun-Blade-1000 in both of them. I think the only real difference between them is that the Blade 2000 looks a bit nicer, and is officially supported with faster CPUs.
The link I provided to the failure on the Xeon machine
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9299
is the same machine where I just posted the output.
If you need an account on a SPARC, it will be a more modern Sun T5240 with 32 GB RAM.
Dave |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年06月24日 19:07:27 | drkirkby | set | recipients:
+ drkirkby, mark.dickinson |
| 2010年06月24日 19:07:27 | drkirkby | set | messageid: <1277406447.47.0.653170173651.issue9069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年06月24日 19:07:26 | drkirkby | link | issue9069 messages |
| 2010年06月24日 19:07:25 | drkirkby | create |
|