Message108488
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, skrah, srid |
| Date |
2010年06月23日.21:23:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.012242922 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1277328220.3202.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1277216836.46.0.599833830018.issue9020@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I checked every usage of Py_IS* in the tree and this is an isolated
> case. So I think it's better to do the check explicitly and add a
> comment to the Py_IS* macros.
>
>
> Does the patch look good?
Nice. I suppose Py_CHARMASK still needs fixing for the general case,
though). |
|