Message107454
| Author |
lemburg |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, r.david.murray, techtonik, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年06月10日.11:03:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.1258245e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4C10C665.6050005@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1276166931.63.0.284106214297.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@haypocalc.com> added the comment:
>
> I like the idea of a pure Python implementation of the datetime module, for different reasons:
> - it will become the reference implementation
> - other Python interpreters can use it
> - it can be used to test another implementation, eg. the current C version
> - implement/test a new feature is much faster in Python than in C
>
> About the last point: I already used _pyio many times to fix a bug or to develop a new feature. _pyio helps to choice the right solution because you can easily write a short patch and so compare different solutions.
Ah, so that where the Python io module hides. Thanks for the pointer. |
|