Message107141
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky |
| Date |
2010年06月05日.15:39:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.018540177 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1275752348.33.0.507552521147.issue8907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Doc/library/time.rst differs in trunk and py3k. It appears that the trunk version is more up to date and can simply replace the py3k version, but I would like to have another pair of eyes to take a look before committing.
I also noticed that time.asctime signature is displayed as asctime([t]) and as asctime([tuple]) in docstring. I think docstring variant is better. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年06月05日 15:39:09 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky |
| 2010年06月05日 15:39:08 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1275752348.33.0.507552521147.issue8907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年06月05日 15:39:06 | belopolsky | link | issue8907 messages |
| 2010年06月05日 15:39:06 | belopolsky | create |
|