Message106609
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Trundle, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, tarek, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年05月27日.12:24:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0014285318 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<201005271424.13812.victor.stinner@haypocalc.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1274962281.31.0.664660375515.issue8828@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
> > Would you prefer to not define the function instead of writing a pseudo-
> > atomic function?
>
> Your current implementation is useless, since it doesn't achieve anything
> new. Besides, if the function isn't atomic, don't name it atomic_XXX.
Someone may reimplement it with unlink+rename which is worse :-)
But ok, you prefer to not define the function if no real atomic implementation
can be written. |
|