Message106381
| Author |
stutzbach |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, mark.dickinson, mcherm, rhettinger, stutzbach, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年05月24日.19:50:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0053002564 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1274730603.91.0.569804569669.issue1289118@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't have a strong feeling about the method of rounding. My thinking is: If my application is sensitive to how the last microsecond is rounded, then I shouldn't be using a type that only gives me 1-microsecond precision.
(Likewise, if my application is sensitive to how the last binary digital of the floating point mantissa is rounded ... I'm in trouble)
That said, round-to-nearest strikes me as the least-surprising approach. |
|