Message105497
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年05月11日.11:12:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00031324226 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1273576324.41.0.548705222794.issue8684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
This must be retargeted to 3.2. Also, the patch lacks some tests.
It seems PEP 8 compliance could be better: function names shouldn't be CamelCased.
Is LocalSynchronize() an implementation detail rather than a public API? If so, I think it would be better if it started with an underscore. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年05月11日 11:12:04 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola |
| 2010年05月11日 11:12:04 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1273576324.41.0.548705222794.issue8684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年05月11日 11:12:02 | pitrou | link | issue8684 messages |
| 2010年05月11日 11:12:01 | pitrou | create |
|