Message105304
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
gvanrossum, lemburg, loewis, r.david.murray, scoder, stutzbach, vstinner, zooko |
| Date |
2010年05月08日.16:02:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0045968746 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4BE58B27.9000808@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<m2reae285401005080848r8c64cb57m2b74b3001cbf1f06@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
>> Are you sure this doesn't get optimized away in practice ?
>
> I'm sure it doesn't get optimized away by gcc 4.3, where I tested it. :)
Did you mean to include the hunk from msg105295 as part of the patch?
If so, wouldn't that defeat the whole point of the patch? |
|