Message104488
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, enolte, loewis, r.david.murray, stutzbach, techtonik |
| Date |
2010年04月29日.12:08:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.089831196 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1272542911.9.0.31991220272.issue2810@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
How much would increasing the loop count slow down the test? Since if the bug isn't present the loop will run to the end every time, if it is non-trivial it would probably be better to keep it shorter, since Brian said it failed one way or another 9 out of 10 times. Either way, a note in the test that it may occasionally pass even if the bug is present, but should fail most of the time, would be a good idea. |
|