Message104452
| Author |
nirai |
| Recipients |
DazWorrall, aconrad, alex, andrix, brian.curtin, carljm, coderanger, cool-RR, dabeaz, djc, donaldjeo, durin42, eric.araujo, eric.smith, flox, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jhylton, karld, kevinwatters, konryd, larry, loewis, mahmoudimus, movement, neologix, nirai, pitrou, rcohen, rh0dium, tarek, thouis, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2010年04月28日.19:17:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.15288442 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1272482265.48.0.291749923851.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> The simple solution: give up QPC and use timeGetTime() with timeBeginPeriod(1), which is totally
> reliable but only has millisecond accuracy at best.
It is preferable to use a high precision clock and I think the code addresses the multi-core time skew problem (pending testing). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月28日 19:17:46 | nirai | set | recipients:
+ nirai, loewis, jhylton, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, movement, larry, eric.smith, kevinwatters, tarek, djc, karld, carljm, coderanger, durin42, eric.araujo, alex, andrix, konryd, brian.curtin, flox, DazWorrall, cool-RR, rh0dium, rcohen, dabeaz, mahmoudimus, aconrad, ysj.ray, neologix, thouis, donaldjeo |
| 2010年04月28日 19:17:45 | nirai | set | messageid: <1272482265.48.0.291749923851.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月28日 19:17:43 | nirai | link | issue7946 messages |
| 2010年04月28日 19:17:43 | nirai | create |
|