Message104335
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
DazWorrall, aconrad, alex, andrix, brian.curtin, carljm, coderanger, cool-RR, dabeaz, djc, donaldjeo, durin42, eric.araujo, eric.smith, flox, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jhylton, karld, kevinwatters, konryd, larry, loewis, mahmoudimus, movement, neologix, nirai, pitrou, rcohen, rh0dium, tarek, thouis, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2010年04月27日.16:45:56 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.1786774e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1272386891.3413.7.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1272375885.82.0.776192486581.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I stand corrected. However, I'm going to have to think of a
> completely different approach for carrying out that functionality as I
> don't know how the take_gil() function is able to determine whether
> gil_last_holder has been deleted or not.
Please note take_gil() currently doesn't depend on the validity of the
pointer. gil_last_holder is just used as an opaque value, equivalent to
a thread id. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月27日 16:45:59 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, jhylton, gregory.p.smith, jcea, movement, larry, eric.smith, kevinwatters, tarek, djc, karld, carljm, coderanger, durin42, eric.araujo, nirai, alex, andrix, konryd, brian.curtin, flox, DazWorrall, cool-RR, rh0dium, rcohen, dabeaz, mahmoudimus, aconrad, ysj.ray, neologix, thouis, donaldjeo |
| 2010年04月27日 16:45:56 | pitrou | link | issue7946 messages |
| 2010年04月27日 16:45:56 | pitrou | create |
|