Message104317
| Author |
dabeaz |
| Recipients |
DazWorrall, aconrad, alex, andrix, brian.curtin, carljm, coderanger, cool-RR, dabeaz, djc, donaldjeo, durin42, eric.araujo, eric.smith, flox, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jhylton, karld, kevinwatters, konryd, larry, loewis, mahmoudimus, movement, neologix, nirai, pitrou, rcohen, rh0dium, tarek, thouis, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2010年04月27日.12:44:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.356624e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1272372286.19.0.963204766455.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That second access of gil_last_holder->cpu_bound is safe because that block of code is never entered unless some other thread currently holds the GIL. If a thread holds the GIL, then gil_last_holder is guaranteed to have a valid value. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月27日 12:44:46 | dabeaz | set | recipients:
+ dabeaz, loewis, jhylton, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, movement, larry, eric.smith, kevinwatters, tarek, djc, karld, carljm, coderanger, durin42, eric.araujo, nirai, alex, andrix, konryd, brian.curtin, flox, DazWorrall, cool-RR, rh0dium, rcohen, mahmoudimus, aconrad, ysj.ray, neologix, thouis, donaldjeo |
| 2010年04月27日 12:44:46 | dabeaz | set | messageid: <1272372286.19.0.963204766455.issue7946@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月27日 12:44:45 | dabeaz | link | issue7946 messages |
| 2010年04月27日 12:44:45 | dabeaz | create |
|