Message104316
| Author |
koen |
| Recipients |
cgohlke, koen, loewis, mhammond, tarek |
| Date |
2010年04月27日.12:43:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.006314e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1272372203.43.0.893240526004.issue7833@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
There should be no manifest embedded into wininst, because then the cases which Issue 4120 fixed (a CRT installed into a local folder, instead of system-wide, due to limited access rights), will 'break' again: the installer can then no longer work unless there is a system-wide installation of the CRT.
Option #1, #2 and #3 all sound reasonable (and #2 is the current situation).
I have some doubts about option #4: it is a very specific use case, and then the whole benefit of issue 4120 is lost, because stripping runtimes would have to be removed again. Why is putting a separate manifest file next to the DLL not an option? Combined with #3 (allow extension developer to disable embedding of manifests) a separate manifest can fix the problem. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月27日 12:43:23 | koen | set | recipients:
+ koen, loewis, mhammond, tarek, cgohlke |
| 2010年04月27日 12:43:23 | koen | set | messageid: <1272372203.43.0.893240526004.issue7833@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月27日 12:43:22 | koen | link | issue7833 messages |
| 2010年04月27日 12:43:21 | koen | create |
|