Message103668
| Author |
jafo |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, jafo, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年04月20日.04:25:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.0874482e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1271737565.16.0.219151301863.issue8451@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Antoine: I believe I have everything you mentioned addressed with the new patch. That was an awesome review, thank you so much.
The only things I didn't do were parts of the last two items you bring up:
If PyTuple_New(0) fails, bail out.
If syslog_openlog fails, bail out.
syslog(3) can continue even if the openlog() fails. It won't have the expected "ident" string, but it *WILL* log.
I believe this is the desired behavior.
NOTE: I puled the code out that does all the sys.argv handling, which I think made that whole section of code much easier to read, particularly with the new changes. The down side is that the code to be reviewed is quite different now.
I also found a leak in the call to syslog_openlog() where I wasn't DECREFing the return.
Can you please review these changes? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月20日 04:26:10 | jafo | set | recipients:
+ jafo, pitrou, eric.smith |
| 2010年04月20日 04:26:09 | jafo | set | messageid: <1271737565.16.0.219151301863.issue8451@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月20日 04:25:55 | jafo | link | issue8451 messages |
| 2010年04月20日 04:25:54 | jafo | create |
|