Message103653
| Author |
tleeuwenburg@gmail.com |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, fredrikj, jess.austin, jribbens, mark.dickinson, r.david.murray, tleeuwenburg@gmail.com, vstinner, webograph |
| Date |
2010年04月19日.22:47:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.9880523e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<j2y43c8685c1004191547g741875a0me8eae7a6eb5dd93c@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1271709972.34.0.842703267137.issue2706@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Tennessee, are you still tracking this issue? If not, can I steal it from
> you. :)
>
Hi Mark,
Please feel free to steal it from me! Wonderful to see some movement on this
issue...
> > I found out that timedelta % int is not supported in the
> > released versions while timedelta // int is.
>
> Mmm. Interesting. :)
>
> I think it would be fine to add timedelta % timedelta in this patch, and
> then open another feature request for timedelta % int and friends as you
> suggest. I don't think divmod(timedelta, timedelta) should go in if
> timedelta % timedelta doesn't also go in.
>
I'm an incrementalist -- I'm happy with one step at a time, so for what it's
worth I'd be happy to see divmod go in alone with % to be added later.
However, seeing as I'm really contributing, I'd say feel free to disregard
my vote of +1... :)
Regards,
-Tennessee |
| Files |
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
unnamed
|
tleeuwenburg@gmail.com,
2010年04月19日.22:47:27
|
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月19日 22:47:30 | tleeuwenburg@gmail.com | set | recipients:
+ tleeuwenburg@gmail.com, jribbens, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, vstinner, jess.austin, fredrikj, webograph, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, Alexander.Belopolsky |
| 2010年04月19日 22:47:27 | tleeuwenburg@gmail.com | link | issue2706 messages |
| 2010年04月19日 22:47:27 | tleeuwenburg@gmail.com | create |
|