Message103317
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年04月16日.12:44:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0042869356 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1271421861.7.0.171960842591.issue8405@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
With the patch, the test have 1.0 second to succeed. I would prefer 5.0 or 10.0 seconds: it should not waste the 10 seconds because it should succeed if a new milliseconds. But if the machine is "slow" (which is the topic of the issue), you can give some more seconds to the test. So max=100, sleep=0.1 |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月16日 12:44:21 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, r.david.murray, brian.curtin |
| 2010年04月16日 12:44:21 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1271421861.7.0.171960842591.issue8405@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月16日 12:44:20 | vstinner | link | issue8405 messages |
| 2010年04月16日 12:44:20 | vstinner | create |
|