Message103230
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
beazley, dabeaz, flox, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, techtonik, torsten |
| Date |
2010年04月15日.16:48:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.5706874e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1271350242.3425.21.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1271349284.96.0.5465077793.issue8299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Yes, we put #error in both places (defining and undefining
> USE_SEMAPHORES). The colleague in question is Christian Tismer, he is
> unlikely to have gotten it wrong.
Ok, so can you or Christian open an issue about it? We should try to fix
it.
> I am also curious why David Beazley kept talking about the "binary
> semaphore" when it is apparent that that is supposed to be a "hack" to
> use on platforms that don't have posix semaphores.
I think David often uses technical terms (such as "semaphore" or
"signal") in more generic meanings than what you might expect :) |
|