Message102840
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
beazley, dabeaz, flox, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, techtonik, torsten |
| Date |
2010年04月11日.14:59:04 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.6425373e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1270998068.3494.11.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1270997187.54.0.0415144685384.issue8299@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Antoine (2): The need to have do_yield is a symptom of the brokenness
> of the GIL.
Of course it is. But the point of the benchmark is to give valid results
even with the old broken GIL.
I could remove do_yield and still have it give valid results, but that
would mean running each step for 30 seconds instead of 2. I don't like
having to wait several minutes for benchmark numbers :-) |
|