Message102751
| Author |
eric.smith |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, eric.smith, r.david.murray, techtonik |
| Date |
2010年04月09日.21:28:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0002637206 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1270848488.68.0.66093595085.issue8355@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I tried -p1 and it failed, but no matter. The contents were clear enough, and exactly how I would have changed the code.
$ patch -p1 < 8355.diff-py-unified-by-default.diff
patching file Tools/scripts/diff.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 13.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 34.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Tools/scripts/diff.py.rej
The new patch worked for me.
I'm -0 on this change, for what it's worth. It's probably all irrelevant, anyway. I can't imagine anyone actually generates their diffs with diff.py. As a useful demonstration of how difflib works, it does its job as it currently stands. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年04月09日 21:28:08 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, techtonik, eric.araujo, r.david.murray |
| 2010年04月09日 21:28:08 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1270848488.68.0.66093595085.issue8355@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年04月09日 21:28:06 | eric.smith | link | issue8355 messages |
| 2010年04月09日 21:28:06 | eric.smith | create |
|