Message102750
| Author |
fperez |
| Recipients |
Yaroslav.Halchenko, brian.curtin, exarkun, fperez, michael.foord, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年04月09日.21:19:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.9703694e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1270847991.24.0.339680255809.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yarick: Yes, I do actually see the value of the summary view. When I have a parametric test that fails, I tend to just run nose with -x so it stops at the first error and with the --pdb options to study it, so I simply ignore all the other failures. To me, test failures are quite often like compiler error messages: if there's a lot of them, it's best to look only at the first few, fix those and try again, because the rest could be coming from the same cause.
I don't know if Michael has plans/bandwidth to add the summary support as well, but I agree it would be very nice to have, just not at the expense of individual reporting. |
|