Message102657
| Author |
purpleidea |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, pitrou, purpleidea, r.david.murray, tarek, thijs |
| Date |
2010年04月09日.00:22:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.3222362e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1270772536.31.0.233138727002.issue6142@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
i'm fine with that and willing to contribute patches, however i would feel better if whoever upstream was, was more supportive of the idea.
someone let me know.
a thought:
- it's true (as mentioned) that distclean isn't necessarily directly related to distributing python scripts, however (in my mind anyways) i see distutils as a replacement for common things we do in makefiles. so as a result if we did this we could get rid of makefiles and provide useful "action" targets such as distclean, test, etc... 100% pure python if needed... |
|