Message101946
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
cbay, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年03月30日.16:46:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.005935312 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1269967719.3440.37.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1269967401.36.0.387374361347.issue8240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> If socket.write() returns zero byte written, I'll have to wait until I
> get another chance to send my buffer. But in the meantime, some more
> data might get appended to the buffer, and the string returned by
> getvalue() will be different from the first call (and thus, I can't
> really cache it).
>
> I could find some tricks (like using multiple buffers), but it would
> be ugly.
Right. I think we should somehow support your use case, but I'm not sure
whether it should be the default. |
|