Message101039
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
grmtz, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年03月14日.02:49:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0061246944 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1268534957.09.0.999696045543.issue8132@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Per the RFC, this is the correct behavior. An encoded word *must* begin and end either at the field boundary or with whitespace. So ...?=Arobase, with no whitespace between the = and Arobase, makes your first example into an invalid encoded word, and thus it is returned as if it were plain ASCII.
One could argue that email could be smarter and interpret this string as an encoded word anyway, following the Postel principle (be generous in what you accept), but it currently does not do so, and not doing so is not a bug.
email6 will handle such non-RFC compliant examples better, if all goes well. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年03月14日 02:49:17 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, grmtz |
| 2010年03月14日 02:49:17 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1268534957.09.0.999696045543.issue8132@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年03月14日 02:49:15 | r.david.murray | link | issue8132 messages |
| 2010年03月14日 02:49:14 | r.david.murray | create |
|