Message100922
| Author |
effbot |
| Recipients |
effbot, flox, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, scoder |
| Date |
2010年03月12日.10:22:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0012124658 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1268389361.54.0.405869928108.issue8047@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
"I wouldn't raise much opposition against tobytes() as an alias for tostring(), although that sounds more like duplicating an otherwise simple API."
Adding an alias would be a way address the 2.X/3.X terminology overlap; string traditionally implies 8-bit in 2.X, and apparently now Unicode in 3.X. That's likely to cause a lot of confusion for people switching over (and to people writing 3.X documentation, as well; the array module's documentation is an example).
ET isn't the only thing with tostring functionality, of course -- it's pretty much the standard name for "serialize data structure to byte string for later transmission" -- so it probably wouldn't hurt with a python-dev pronouncement here. |
|