Message100851
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, flox, jnoller, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, schmir, tarek, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年03月11日.13:52:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.494635e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1268315524.79.0.0999012773727.issue7774@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Oh well, it's really hard to test the tests in my working copy because it depends on a lot of factors: the current working directory, is Python installed or not, the OS, etc. The test introduced in r78835 was incorrect (only the test, the fix is correct): r78836 fixes the test for Windows (where sys.executable is correct even if argv[0] is set to a non existent program name, I don't understand how) and r78837 fixes the test for Ubuntu.
r78837 is a temporary fix to workaround #7774 bug: it's the same hack used in test_executable_with_cwd() from test_subprocess. |
|