Message100762
| Author |
ronaldoussoren |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, ronaldoussoren, stefanholek |
| Date |
2010年03月09日.22:00:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.0286807e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1268172031.72.0.863621517773.issue6953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Changing get_history_item to be 0-based would be a backward incompatible change.
The point of my report is that the documentation of the readline documentation should mention how the APIs actually behave, you currently have to hunt down that information in the documentation from libreadline.
Stefan's message does point to a potentional issue though: history_base is not exposed to python code, and hence Python code cannot use the correct offset. I don't understand the documentation for history_get in that same document though, it says "get the item at `offset`, starting from `history_base`". I don't understand if that means that `offset` must be at least `history_base` or something else (and won't read the readline sources to find out). |
|