homepage

Current OOP API of datetime is ugly:
from datetime import datetime
print datetime.today().isoformat()
The proposal is to add today() and now() as module functions:
from datetime import today, now
print today()
# datetime.date(2010, 6, 5)
print now()
# datetime.datetime(2010, 6, 5, 9, 48, 4, 868000)

How hard is it to add
now = datetime.now
todate = date.today
at the top of your module is you really like shorter names?
-1

Note that it is important to keep class methods because in some cases it is convenient to obtain now/today from datetime/date instances instead of importing them from the module. So deprecating class methods is not an option and adding module level functions that are equivalent to existing class methods is not TOOWTDI.

I actually agree with Anatoly here. I find it much more intuitive to do
 import datetime
 timestamp = datetime.now()
than to do 
 timestamp = datetime.datetime.now()
I always have to remember that 'now' is a class method, often after getting a "datetime module has no attribute 'now'" message. In most standard library modules a function like that would be, well, a function. I can't imagine code where I'd find it more convenient to get 'now' from the class, and if I saw code like
 timestamp = othertimestamp.now()
I'd run screaming.
Personally I think the class methods would be better off deprecated in favor of module level functions.
However, all that said, the datetime API is what it is, and I'm not sure it is worth going through a deprecation cycle for this. (Though othertimestamp.now() really does give me the heebie jeebies.)

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:37 PM, R. David Murray
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
>
> I actually agree with Anatoly here. I find it much more intuitive to do
>
> import datetime
>
>  timestamp = datetime.now()
>
> than to do
>
>  timestamp = datetime.datetime.now()
>
Given the unfortunate name clash between the class and the module, I
never do "import datetime" and instead doe "from datetime import
datetime, date". I find it very convenient that importing datetime
class brings in all related functions and I don't need to import
factory functions separately.
Also, ISTM that the datetime module was designed to allow easy
extension by subclassing. The factory methods are written so that
they work for subclasses:
... pass
>>> Date.today()
Date(2010, 6, 10)
Writing a separate module level today() for the subclass would be quite awkward.

FWIW, I concur with the rejection.

Raymond mention your reasons please. I may need them one day for describing development process.