homepage

if you subclass a list, and cast it to tuple, the casting does not iterate through the list.
(casing to list does)
for example, i needed a WeakList where the list only internally contains WeakReferences that gets deleted as soon as the object ref count goes to zero.. so:
import weakref
class WeakList(list):
 def __init__(self, items = ()):
 super(WeakList, self).__init__([weakref.ref(i, self.remove) for i in items])
 def __contains__(self, item):
 return super(WeakList, self).__contains__(weakref.ref(item))
 def __getitem__(self, index):
 if isinstance(index, slice):
 return [i() for i in super(WeakList, self).__getitem__(index)]
 else:
 return super(WeakList, self).__getitem__(index)()
 def __setitem__(self, index, item):
 if isinstance(index, slice):
 item = [weakref.ref(i, self.remove) for i in item]
 else:
 item = weakref.ref(item, self.remove)
 return super(WeakList, self).__setitem__(index, item)
 def __iter__(self):
 for i in list(super(WeakList, self).__iter__()):
 yield i()
 def remove(self, item):
 if isinstance(item, weakref.ReferenceType):
 super(WeakList, self).remove(item)
 else:
 super(WeakList, self).remove(weakref.ref(item))
 def append(self, item):
 return super(WeakList, self).append(weakref.ref(item, self.remove))
# write some test code:
class Dummy():
 pass
 
a = Dummy()
b = Dummy()
l = WeakList()
l.append(a)
l.append(b)
print(a)
<__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4ab8>
print(b)
<__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4b00>
print(l)
[<weakref at 0x7f2999433e68; to 'instance' at 0x7f29993f4ab8>, <weakref at 0x7f2999433ec0; to 'instance' at 0x7f29993f4b00>]
print([i for i in l])
[<__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4ab8>, <__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4b00>]
print(list(l))
[<__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4ab8>, <__main__.Dummy instance at 0x7f29993f4b00>]
print(tuple(l))
(<weakref at 0x7f2999433e68; to 'instance' at 0x7f29993f4ab8>, <weakref at 0x7f2999433ec0; to 'instance' at 0x7f29993f4b00>)
^ notice how you are getting weak references back instead of tuples.

(Siming, when you post a mixture of code and output, please comment out output with # so the example can be run as is.)
I cannot reproduce the difference reported. I added #s and ran the cut and pasted code (uploaded) on 2.7, 3.5, and 3.6 installed on Win 10. For 3.6, 
Python 3.6.0b2 (default, Oct 10 2016, 21:15:32) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
For me, the tuple output is exactly the same as the list output, except for '()' versus '[]'. In 3.5+, 'instance' is changed to 'object' for both list and tuple. 
(<__main__.Dummy object at 0x000001839C1F32E8>, <__main__.Dummy object at 0x000001839C384DA0>)
Siming, please cut and paste the interactive splash line, like the above, that tells us the binary and OS you used.

my apologies, was in a rush to get it posted. attached a better version of the file.
i can reproduce this in python 3.4.1 and python 2.7.8 (both 32 and 64 bit) on RHEL 6.6
however after verifying again - this doesn't seem to be an issue in 3.4.5 (did not verify earlier versions), so it is indeed already fixed. closing.
time to upgrade!