This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2008年05月02日 18:53 by mrm, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (8) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg66102 - (view) | Author: Mike MacFaden (mrm) | Date: 2008年05月02日 18:53 | |
the url http://docs.python.org/lib/node633.html states 1) address_family The family of protocols to which the server's socket belongs. socket.AF_INET and socket.AF_UNIX are two possible values. would suggest including socket.AF_INET6 as well if it is supported or what criteria makes a socket not usable with this class. |
|||
| msg66105 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) | Date: 2008年05月02日 19:30 | |
I fail to see the issue. There are many other address families supported as well, such as AF_BLUETOOTH, AF_PACKET, AF_TIPC, and AF_NETLINK, depending on the system. The documentation just lists some examples. |
|||
| msg66133 - (view) | Author: Mike MacFaden (mrm) | Date: 2008年05月02日 23:56 | |
Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > > I fail to see the issue. There are many other address > families supported as well, such as AF_BLUETOOTH, AF_PACKET, > AF_TIPC, and AF_NETLINK, depending on the system. The > documentation just lists some examples. the way i read the text, i gathered that it might not work with sockets belonging to a subset of address families. thanks, mike |
|||
| msg66143 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) | Date: 2008年05月03日 06:55 | |
> the way i read the text, i gathered that it might not work > with sockets belonging to a subset of address families. I still cannot see anything wrong with that text, but then, English is not my native language. Can you suggest a different formulation? |
|||
| msg66275 - (view) | Author: Mike MacFaden (mrm) | Date: 2008年05月05日 17:19 | |
so i suggest just removing this sentence -- AF_INET and socket.AF_UNIX are two possible values. this would imply that all socket address families are supported. but if that is not true just list the exceptions. |
|||
| msg66290 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) | Date: 2008年05月05日 21:16 | |
> so i suggest just removing this sentence -- > > AF_INET and socket.AF_UNIX are two possible values. > > this would imply that all socket address families are supported. > but if that is not true just list the exceptions. I think this will confuse users which don't know what an "address family" is - they are left guessing what possibly could be in this field. |
|||
| msg66291 - (view) | Author: Mike MacFaden (mrm) | Date: 2008年05月05日 21:42 | |
then change 'possible values' to 'for example' |
|||
| msg66621 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) | Date: 2008年05月11日 10:59 | |
Okay, this should now be clearer in r63057. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:56:33 | admin | set | github: 46990 |
| 2008年05月11日 10:59:51 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg66621 |
| 2008年05月05日 21:42:05 | mrm | set | messages: + msg66291 |
| 2008年05月05日 21:17:00 | loewis | set | messages: + msg66290 |
| 2008年05月05日 17:19:03 | mrm | set | messages: + msg66275 |
| 2008年05月03日 06:55:22 | loewis | set | messages: + msg66143 |
| 2008年05月02日 23:56:49 | mrm | set | messages: + msg66133 |
| 2008年05月02日 19:30:12 | loewis | set | nosy:
+ loewis messages: + msg66105 |
| 2008年05月02日 18:53:13 | mrm | create | |