homepage

I noticed compiler warned "'longval' is not used anywhere."
And I found 'longval' was not initialized where HAVE_LONG_LONG
was not defined. Is attached patch intended behavior? Thanks.

Oh, I forgot this. When I debuged with
#undef HAVE_LONG_LONG
I noticed test_sqlite.py failed with this error message.
======================================================================
ERROR: CheckLargeInt (sqlite3.test.types.SqliteTypeTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "e:\python-dev\py3k\lib\sqlite3\test\types.py", line 52, in
CheckLargeInt
 self.cur.execute("insert into test(i) values (?)", (num,))
OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to C long
======================================================================
ERROR: CheckLargeInt (sqlite3.test.types.DeclTypesTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "e:\python-dev\py3k\lib\sqlite3\test\types.py", line 146, in
CheckLargeIn
t
 self.cur.execute("insert into test(i) values (?)", (num,))
OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to C long
Maybe some fix for test is needed?

Gerhard, what do you think?

My problem is that I can't really test (better than #undefining
HAVE_LONG_LONG) this, because I have no platform to test on that doesn't
have long longs.
I'm not even sure SQLite *really* works when there is no 64-bit type.
I'll ask on the SQLite mailing list. If that is so, then I'd like to get
rid of the superfluous #ifdefs.

SQLite requires 64-bit integers in order to build. So the whole
HAVE_LONG_LONG #ifdefing was useless. I've removed it in r62700.