homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: pdb unable to jump to first statement
Type: behavior Stage: commit review
Components: Interpreter Core Versions: Python 3.1, Python 2.7
process
Status: closed Resolution:
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: collinwinter, gotgenes, jyasskin, rockyb
Priority: normal Keywords: needs review, patch

Created on 2007年03月27日 21:07 by gotgenes, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
simple.py gotgenes, 2007年03月27日 21:07 A simple script to try out reproducing the jump bug in pdb.
jumpbug.py gotgenes, 2007年04月02日 00:06 Code to demonstrate f_lineno error
jumpbug2.py gotgenes, 2007年04月02日 00:07 Code to be executed by jumpbug.py
jump_to_firstlineno.patch jyasskin, 2009年05月18日 18:50 Test and fix
Messages (10)
msg31658 - (view) Author: Chris Lasher (gotgenes) Date: 2007年03月27日 21:07
The Python debugger is unable to "jump" back to the first executable statement in a frame once that statement has been executed. For example:
chris@feathers:~/development/playground$ python -m pdb simple.py 
> /home/chris/development/playground/simple.py(3)?()
-> a = 1
(Pdb) next
> /home/chris/development/playground/simple.py(4)?()
-> b = 2
(Pdb) jump 3
> /home/chris/development/playground/simple.py(3)?()
-> a = 1
(Pdb) list
 1 #!/usr/bin/env python
 2 
 3 a = 1
 4 -> b = 2
 5 
 6 c = a + b
 7 
 8 print c
[EOF]
(Pdb) next
> /home/chris/development/playground/simple.py(6)?()
-> c = a + b
One can see that after supposedly "jump"ing to line 3 at the second command, when "list"ing the line, the debugger is actually at line 4. The "next" command further demonstrates this since it re-executes line 4 and moves to line 6.
This issue was raised on comp.lang.python. (For example, see
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/7960201616873f41/e9623c08e3618051>
or if that link is munged, refer to
<http://tinyurl.com/324feu>
Duncan Booth offers the following:
[quote]
I verified (with a print statement in pdb) that assigning to self.curframe.f_lineno sets self.curframe.f_lineno and sel.curframe.f_lasti incorrectly
...
The problem looks to be in frameobject.c:
 addr = 0;
 line = f->f_code->co_firstlineno;
 new_lasti = -1;
 for (offset = 0; offset < lnotab_len; offset += 2) {
 addr += lnotab[offset];
 line += lnotab[offset+1];
 if (line >= new_lineno) {
 new_lasti = addr;
 new_lineno = line;
 break;
 }
 }
The first bytes in lnotab are the length and line increment for line 3 (i.e. 6, 1). If line==f->f_code->co_firstlineno it should set new_lasti=0, new_lineno=line but the loop still executes once which increments new_lasti and new_lineno to the next line (6, 4).
[/quote]
And Rocky Bernstein offers the following:
[quote]
Best as I can tell, it looks like a bug in Python. pdb, pydb, rpdb2 all handle the "jump" command by changing the frame f_lineno value. When the corresponding code pointer has offset 0 (or equivalently and more simlply as you put it, is the first statement) this doesn't seem to work properly.
[/quote]
msg31659 - (view) Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) * (Python committer) Date: 2007年03月28日 21:54
Could you work up a full test case for this? Or better yet, a patch?
msg31660 - (view) Author: Chris Lasher (gotgenes) Date: 2007年03月29日 01:24
Truthfully, I don't have enough know-how to write a full test case or a patch. I have put forth a request on the comp.lang.python thread (link in original report) for those that would to please do so.
msg31661 - (view) Author: Rocky Bernstein (rockyb) Date: 2007年03月31日 10:32
Although a single file unit test would be nice, below is a short simple program that I think clearly shows the bug. Alas, as a follow-up comment I don't see a way to attach files so I have to paste it inline. However with this example and the information from Duncan Booth, I think the problem and how to fix it is pretty clear.
file: jumpbug.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import inspect, linecache, sys
def tracer(frame, event, arg):
 global z
 (filename, line_no) = inspect.getframeinfo(frame)[0:2]
 print "Event %s at line %d:" % (event, line_no)
 print "\t", linecache.getline(filename, line_no),
 print "----------------------"
 try: 
 if z == 0:
 if line_no == 4:
 print "***We jumped back to line 4 but should have gone to 2**"
 sys.exit(1)
 frame.f_lineno = 2 # And 3 is broken too.
 except NameError:
 pass
 return tracer # This helps emacs figure indentation out
sys.settrace(tracer)
execfile("jumpbug2.py")
#END first file
file jumpbug2.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
x = 2 # This statement gets skipped the 2nd time around
q = 1 # This statement gets skipped too!
try: # tracer() will exit here if z == 0 and line_no == 4
 y = z 
except NameError:
 z = 0
print "When tracing via tracer(), f_lineno will be set to 2 here."
print "You should never get here when tracing"
file jumpbug2.py:
msg31662 - (view) Author: Chris Lasher (gotgenes) Date: 2007年04月01日 23:53
I'm changing the category. Apparently this is a bug in the Python core, itself, not pdb.
From Rocky Bernstein on comp.lang.python
[quote]
At present it looks like the bug is in Python, and its handling after setting the current frame's f_lineno when it refers to byte code offset 0, not pdb.
[/quote]
msg31663 - (view) Author: Chris Lasher (gotgenes) Date: 2007年04月02日 00:06
File Added: jumpbug.py
msg31664 - (view) Author: Chris Lasher (gotgenes) Date: 2007年04月02日 00:07
File Added: jumpbug2.py
msg88042 - (view) Author: Jeffrey Yasskin (jyasskin) * (Python committer) Date: 2009年05月18日 18:50
The attached patch fixes this problem and adds a test. I'll wait a day
for any comments before committing it. Review at
http://codereview.appspot.com/67063.
msg88125 - (view) Author: Jeffrey Yasskin (jyasskin) * (Python committer) Date: 2009年05月20日 17:58
Fixed in r72796. Will forward-port to py3k shortly.
msg88134 - (view) Author: Jeffrey Yasskin (jyasskin) * (Python committer) Date: 2009年05月20日 19:10
Merged to py3k in r72809.
History
Date User Action Args
2022年04月11日 14:56:23adminsetgithub: 44776
2009年05月20日 19:10:44jyasskinsetstatus: open -> closed

messages: + msg88134
versions: + Python 3.1
2009年05月20日 17:58:35jyasskinsetmessages: + msg88125
stage: patch review -> commit review
2009年05月18日 18:50:33jyasskinsetfiles: + jump_to_firstlineno.patch

versions: + Python 2.7, - Python 2.6
keywords: + needs review, patch
nosy: + jyasskin

messages: + msg88042
stage: test needed -> patch review
2009年03月30日 17:03:54ajaksu2setstage: test needed
type: behavior
versions: + Python 2.6
2007年03月27日 21:07:12gotgenescreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /