Message3110
| Author | amak |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amak, pjenvey |
| Date | 2008年03月29日.17:08:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0013750796 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1206810515.35.0.553550807916.issue1016@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Actually, there are a few options that aren't supported at the moment, including * Keep-alive * Linger * Out-of-band -> inline * Send and receive buffer sizes * Traffic class * TCP_NODELAY On UDP sockets * Broadcast All can have an important impacts on performance and behaviour. For example, send and receive buffer sizes can be an important performance consideration, as this paper about grid data transfer describes Socket Buffer Auto-Sizing for High-Performance Data Transfers http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~jain/publications/sobas_grid.pdf Also, I see that TIPC support has been checked into the cpython trunk, and will be present in 2.6. Transparent InterProcess Communication http://tipc.sourceforge.net/ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-December/075738.html http://bugs.python.org/issue1646 I'll have a look at implementing TIPC, for use in jython 2.6, although we could maybe put it into 2.5. Must raise this on jython-dev. Although I see you've reported the bug against 2.5a1, I'd like to check the fixes into release 22 branch; it would be a good way to get some in-the-wild exposure for the new options, before 2.5 is released. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月29日 17:08:35 | amak | set | spambayes_score: 0.00137508 -> 0.0013750796 recipients: + amak, pjenvey |
| 2008年03月29日 17:08:35 | amak | set | spambayes_score: 0.00137508 -> 0.00137508 messageid: <1206810515.35.0.553550807916.issue1016@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月29日 17:08:35 | amak | link | issue1016 messages |
| 2008年03月29日 17:08:34 | amak | create | |
Supported by Python Software Foundation,
Powered by Roundup