Statistical Finance
See recent articles
Showing new listings for Thursday, 2 July 2026
- [1] arXiv:2607.00475 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: End-to-End Parametric Portfolio Policies for Cross-Asset Futures Timing: When Do AI Models Beat Simple Rules?Subjects: Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST); Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM); Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
Timing-based tilts across asset classes can drive much of the risk and return of a diversified cross-asset portfolio. The standard approach forecasts returns and then optimizes weights. We instead study an end-to-end AI-based policy that maps market states directly to portfolio weights, and we then ask when this one-step modeling approach outperforms simple rules-based strategies. We train these policies on the sixteen most liquid CME futures, where an edge is unlikely to be due to illiquidity, using a differentiable Sharpe ratio loss function, and we benchmark them against equal weighting, risk parity, and time-series momentum. The learned policies rank above the rules on the pooled cross-asset portfolio and in several sub-asset classes, but not uniformly. In gross terms, an LSTM and a transformer-based architecture perform comparably out-of-sample, but diverge when we consider transaction costs. The transformer generates the stronger learned policy, trades far less than the LSTM, and matches or exceeds equal weighting through moderate cost.