Skip to main content
Arduino

Return to Question

better english :P
Source Link

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why am I suspiciousam alerted: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why am I suspicious: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why I am alerted: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

replaced http://electronics.stackexchange.com/ with https://electronics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why am I suspicious: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why am I suspicious: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

To my knowledge the SeeedStudio CAN-Bus shield utilizes D13, and so does the SD-card module I use. And also Arduino Uno's LED_BUILTIN is 13. Am I in danger of some sort of collision here?

I have read this question, but that one describes situation where both modules are on a single shield.

Why am I suspicious: I can perform following sequence: turn the LED on, open file, write, close file, turn the LED off, no apparent problem here. But when I connect my CAN-Bus shield to merely read messages (i.e. no sending data to the shield, not on purpose) my car behaves funny as if I still somehow managed to send some rogue bytes to the shield. (Right side windows and mirror are dead, infotainment display shows dead splash screen, dashboard complains about "engine malfunction" and airbags...)

I wonder if by writing to the SD-card and possibly turning the LED on I didn't send some bytes to the shield. Do I need to somehow Select Slave?

Post Migrated Here from electronics.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
Loading

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /