Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)

Anthology ID:: W16-28
Month:: August
Year:: 2016
Address:: Berlin, Germany
Venues:: ArgMining | WS
Events:: Workshop on Argument Mining (2016) | Other Workshops and Events (2016)
SIG:
Publisher:: Association for Computational Linguistics
URL:: https://aclanthology.org/W16-28/
DOI:: 10.18653/v1/W16-28
Bib Export formats:: BibTeX MODS XML EndNote
PDF:: https://aclanthology.org/W16-28.pdf

Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)
Chris Reed

"What Is Your Evidence?" A Study of Controversial Topics on Social Media
Aseel Addawood | Masooda Bashir

Summarizing Multi-Party Argumentative Conversations in Reader Comment on News
Emma Barker | Robert Gaizauskas

Argumentative texts and clause types
Maria Becker | Alexis Palmer | Anette Frank

Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews
Pavithra Rajendran | Danushka Bollegala | Simon Parsons

The CASS Technique for Evaluating the Performance of Argument Mining
Rory Duthie | John Lawrence | Katarzyna Budzynska | Chris Reed

Extracting Case Law Sentences for Argumentation about the Meaning of Statutory Terms
Jaromír Šavelka | Kevin D. Ashley

Scrutable Feature Sets for Stance Classification
Angrosh Mandya | Advaith Siddharthan | Adam Wyner

Neural Attention Model for Classification of Sentences that Support Promoting/Suppressing Relationship
Yuta Koreeda | Toshihiko Yanase | Kohsuke Yanai | Misa Sato | Yoshiki Niwa

Towards Feasible Guidelines for the Annotation of Argument Schemes
Elena Musi | Debanjan Ghosh | Smaranda Muresan

Identifying Argument Components through TextRank
Georgios Petasis | Vangelis Karkaletsis

Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text
Andreas Peldszus | Manfred Stede

Recognizing the Absence of Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Essays
Christian Stab | Iryna Gurevych

Expert Stance Graphs for Computational Argumentation
Orith Toledo-Ronen | Roy Bar-Haim | Noam Slonim

Fill the Gap! Analyzing Implicit Premises between Claims from Online Debates
Filip Boltužić | Jan Šnajder

Summarising the points made in online political debates
Charlie Egan | Advaith Siddharthan | Adam Wyner

What to Do with an Airport? Mining Arguments in the German Online Participation Project Tempelhofer Feld
Matthias Liebeck | Katharina Esau | Stefan Conrad

Unshared task: (Dis)agreement in online debates
Maria Skeppstedt | Magnus Sahlgren | Carita Paradis | Andreas Kerren