/philosophy/no-ip-ethos.html-diff
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: (削除) 1.77 (削除ここまで) (追記) 1.96 -->
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws noip" -->
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" (追記ここまで) -->
<title>Don't Let (削除) ‘Intellectual Property’ (削除ここまで) (追記) “Intellectual Property” (追記ここまで) Twist Your (削除) Ethos</title> (削除ここまで) (追記) Ethos
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title> (追記ここまで)
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/no-ip-ethos.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
(追記) <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
<div class="article reduced-width"> (追記ここまで)
<h2>Don't Let (削除) ‘Intellectual Property’ (削除ここまで) (追記) “Intellectual Property” (追記ここまで) Twist Your Ethos</h2>
(削除) <p>by (削除ここまで)
(追記) <address class="byline">by (追記ここまで) <a (削除) href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard M.
Stallman</a><br />
June (削除ここまで) (追記) href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard
Stallman</a></address>
<p><i>June (追記ここまで) 09, (削除) 2006</p> (削除ここまで) (追記) 2006</i></p> (追記ここまで)
<p>Most free software licenses are based on copyright law, and
for good reason: Copyright law is much more uniform among
countries than contract law, which is the other possible
choice.</p>
<p>There's another reason not to use contract law: It would
require every distributor to get a user's formal assent to the
contract before providing a copy. To hand someone a CD without
getting his signature first would be forbidden. What a pain in
the neck!</p>
<p>It's true that in countries like China, where copyright law is
generally not enforced, we may also have trouble enforcing free
software license agreements, as Heather Meeker suggests in her
recent (削除) LinuxInsider (削除ここまで) (追記) <cite>LinuxInsider</cite> (追記ここまで) column, (削除) <a href=
"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/50421.html">“Only (削除ここまで) (追記) “<a
href="https://linuxinsider.com/story/only-in-america-copyright-law-key-to-global-free-software-model-50421.html">Only (追記ここまで)
in America? Copyright Law Key to Global Free Software
(削除) Model”</a>.</p> (削除ここまで)
(追記) Model</a>.”</p> (追記ここまで)
<p>However, this is not a reason to press for more copyright
enforcement in China. Although we would use it to protect
people's freedom, we have to recognize that mostly it would be
used by the likes of Microsoft, Disney and Sony to take it
away.</p>
<p>Ironically, we might have more success enforcing copyright in
China than Microsoft, Disney and (削除) Sony — because (削除ここまで) (追記) Sony—because (追記ここまで) what we would
want to do is easier.</p>
<p>Disney wishes to stamp out semi-underground organizations that
sell exact copies. With free software, regardless of precisely which
free license is used, that kind of copying is legal. What we want to prevent,
when the free software license is the
GNU <a (削除) href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GPL</a>, (削除ここまで) (追記) href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>, (追記ここまで) is the release of
proprietary software products based on our code. That kind of abuse
is at its worst when carried out by large, well-known (削除) companies
— and (削除ここまで) (追記) companies—and (追記ここまで)
they are easier targets for enforcement. So GPL
enforcement in China is not a lost cause, though it won't be
easy.</p>
<h3>No Chinese Laundry</h3>
<p>Nonetheless, Meeker's claim that this leads to a global
problem is simply absurd. You can't “launder”
material copyrighted in the U.S. by moving it through China, as
she ought to know.</p>
<p>If someone violates the GNU GPL by distributing a (削除) non-free (削除ここまで) (追記) nonfree (追記ここまで)
modified version of GCC in the U.S., it won't make any difference
if it was obtained or modified in China. U.S. copyright law will
be enforced just the same.</p>
<p>Although this error might seem to be the central point of
Meeker's article, it is not. The real central point of the article
is the perspective embodied in her use of the term
“intellectual (削除) property”. (削除ここまで) (追記) property.” (追記ここまで) She uses this term pervasively
as though it refers to something (削除) coherent — something (削除ここまで) (追記) coherent—something (追記ここまで) it makes
sense to talk about and think about. If you believe that, you have
accepted the article's hidden assumption.</p>
<h3>Loose Language</h3>
<p>Sometimes Meeker switches between “intellectual
property” and “copyright” as if they were two
names for the same thing. Sometimes she switches between
“intellectual property” and “patents” as if they were
two names for the same thing. Having studied those two laws,
Meeker knows they are vastly different; all they have in common
is an abstract sketch of their form.</p>
<p>Other “intellectual property” laws don't even
share that much with them. The implication that you can treat
them all as the same thing is fundamentally misleading.</p>
<p>Along with the term “intellectual property” goes a
false understanding of what these laws are for. Meeker speaks of
an “ethos” of “intellectual property”
that exists in the U.S. because “intellectual property is
in the Constitution.” That's the mother of all
mistakes.</p>
<p>What is really in the U.S. Constitution? It doesn't mention
“intellectual (削除) property”, (削除ここまで) (追記) property,” (追記ここまで) and it says nothing at all
about most of the laws that term is applied to. Only two of (削除) them —
copyright (削除ここまで)
(追記) them—copyright (追記ここまで) law and patent (削除) law — are (削除ここまで) (追記) law—are (追記ここまで) treated there.</p>
<p>What does the Constitution say about them? What is its ethos?
It is nothing like the “intellectual property ethos”
that Meeker imagines.</p>
<h3>Failure to Execute</h3>
<p>What the Constitution says is that copyright law and patent law
are optional. They need not exist. It says that if they do exist,
their purpose is to provide a public (削除) benefit — to (削除ここまで) (追記) benefit—to (追記ここまで) promote
progress by providing artificial incentives.</p>
<p>They are not rights that their holders are entitled to; they
are artificial privileges that we might, or might not, want to
hand out to encourage people to do what we find useful.</p>
<p>It's a wise policy. Too bad (削除) Congress — which (削除ここまで) (追記) Congress—which (追記ここまで) has to carry
it out on our (削除) behalf — takes (削除ここまで) (追記) behalf—takes (追記ここまで) its orders from Hollywood and
Microsoft instead of from us.</p>
<p>If you appreciate the U.S. Constitution's wisdom, don't let
“intellectual property” into your ethos; don't let
the “intellectual property” meme infect your
mind.</p>
<p>Practically speaking, copyright and patent and trademark law
have only one thing in common: Each is legitimate only as far as
it serves the public interest. Your interest in your freedom is a
part of the public interest that must be served.</p>
(追記) </div> (追記ここまで)
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div (削除) id="footer"> (削除ここまで) (追記) id="footer" role="contentinfo"> (追記ここまで)
<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
<web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p>
<p>For information on coordinating and (削除) submitting (削除ここまで) (追記) contributing (追記ここまで) translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and (削除) submitting (削除ここまで) (追記) contributing (追記ここまで) translations
of this article.</p>
</div>
(追記) <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
document was modified, or published.
If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> (追記ここまで)
<p>Copyright © 2006, (削除) 2007 (削除ここまで) (追記) 2021 (追記ここまで) Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
(削除) href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative (削除ここまで)
(追記) href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative (追記ここまで)
Commons (削除) Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States (削除ここまで) (追記) Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (追記ここまで) License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2025年12月29日 04:35:01 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
(削除) </div> (削除ここまで)
(追記) </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include --> (追記ここまで)
</body>
</html>