free-sw.html version 1.80
date: 2009年06月30日 12:18:28 +0000; author: rms; state: Exp; lines: +18 -4; commitid: OGaQONubw49LpSTt;
Say that tivoization is unacceptable
Index: free-sw.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.html,v
retrieving revision 1.79
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -U 2 -r1.79 -r1.80
(削除) -- (削除ここまで)
(追記) ++ (追記ここまで) free-sw.html (削除) 27 May (削除ここまで) (追記) 30 Jun (追記ここまで) 2009 (削除) 23:03:29 (削除ここまで) (追記) 12:18:28 (追記ここまで) -0000 (削除) 1.79 (削除ここまで) (追記) 1.80 (追記ここまで)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
<ul>
<li>The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).</li>
<li>The freedom to study how the program works, and (削除) adapt (削除ここまで) (追記) change (追記ここまで) it to
(削除) your needs (削除ここまで) (追記) make
it do what you wish (追記ここまで) (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a
precondition for this.
</li>
<li>The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor
@@ -94,4 +94,14 @@
<p>
(追記) Freedom 1 includes the freedom to use your changed version in place of
the original. If the program is delivered in a product designed to
run someone else's modified versions but refuse to run yours &—
a practice known as “tivoization” or (through
blackwhiting) as “secure boot” — freedom 1 become a
theoretical fiction rather than a practical freedom. This is not
sufficient.
</p>
<p> (追記ここまで)
One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
subroutines and modules. If the program's license says that you
@@ -286,4 +296,8 @@
<ul>
<li><a (追記) href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.79&r2=1.80">Version
1.80</a>: Freedom 1 must be practical, not just theoretical;
i.e., no tivoization.</li>
<li><a (追記ここまで) href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.76&r2=1.77">Version
1.77</a>: Clarify that all retroactive changes to the license are
@@ -385,5 +399,5 @@
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2026年01月28日 17:24:09 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>