free-sw.html version 1.31

date: 2004年12月12日 18:23:56 +0000; author: rms; state: Exp; lines: +6 -5;
Say it's ok to require you identify yourself on your modifications.
Minor clarifications.

Index: free-sw.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -U 2 -r1.30 -r1.31
(削除) -- (削除ここまで)
(追記) ++ (追記ここまで) free-sw.html	(削除) 17 Nov (削除ここまで)	(追記) 12 Dec (追記ここまで) 2004 (削除) 00:47:22 (削除ここまで) (追記) 18:23:56 (追記ここまで) -0000	(削除) 1.30 (削除ここまで)	(追記) 1.31 (追記ここまで)
@@ -94,5 +94,5 @@
the central freedoms; rather it protects them.</p>
<p>
(削除) Thus, you (削除ここまで)
(追記) You (追記ここまで) may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you
may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got
your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the
@@ -105,5 +105,5 @@
<p>
Rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if they
don't (削除) effectively (削除ここまで) (追記) substantively (追記ここまで) block your freedom to release modified versions.
Rules that ``if you make the program available in this way, you must
make it available in that way also'' can be acceptable too, on the
@@ -111,5 +111,6 @@
whether to publish the program or not.) It is also acceptable for the
license to require that, if you have distributed a modified version
and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send (削除) one.</p> (削除ここまで) (追記) one,
or that you identify yourself on your modifications.</p> (追記ここまで)
<p>
In the GNU project, we use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">``copyleft''</a>
@@ -196,5 +197,5 @@
term "free software" because, once you have heard it refers to freedom
rather than price, <a href="free-software-for-freedom.html">it calls
to mind (削除) freedom</a>.</p> (削除ここまで) (追記) freedom</a>. The word "open" never does that.</p> (追記ここまで)
<hr />
@@ -292,5 +293,5 @@
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2026年01月28日 17:24:09 $ $Author: ineiev $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>