This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb:90:102973.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102973. Epub 2025 Jan 4.

Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction

Affiliations
Review

Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction

Devlina Chakravarty et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed structural biology, particularly protein structure prediction. Though AI-based methods, such as AlphaFold (AF), often predict single conformations of proteins with high accuracy and confidence, predictions of alternative folds are often inaccurate, low-confidence, or simply not predicted at all. Here, we review three blind spots that alternative conformations reveal about AF-based protein structure prediction. First, proteins that assume conformations distinct from their training-set homologs can be mispredicted. Second, AF overrelies on its training set to predict alternative conformations. Third, degeneracies in pairwise representations can lead to high-confidence predictions inconsistent with experiment. These weaknesses suggest approaches to predict alternative folds more reliably.

Keywords: Alternative conformations; Deep learning; Fold-switching proteins; Machine learning; Metamorphic proteins; Protein structure prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Update of

References

    1. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Zidek A, Potapenko A, et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold, Nature 596 (2021) 583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Zidek A, Potapenko A, et al., Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14, Proteins 89 (2021) 1711–1721. 10.1002/prot.26257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, Kirkpatrick J, Sifre L, Green T, Qin C, Zidek A, Nelson AWR, Bridgland A, et al., Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature 577 (2020) 706–710. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al., Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3, Nature (2024) 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahdritz G, Bouatta N, Floristean C, Kadyan S, Xia Q, Gerecke W, O’Donnell TJ, Berenberg D, Fisk I, Zanichelli N, et al., OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization, Nat Methods (2024) 10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /