This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 25;14(1):25441.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69816-3.

Structural and free energy landscape analysis for the discovery of antiviral compounds targeting the cap-binding domain of influenza polymerase PB2

Affiliations

Structural and free energy landscape analysis for the discovery of antiviral compounds targeting the cap-binding domain of influenza polymerase PB2

Amr S Abouzied et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Influenza poses a significant threat to global health, with the ability to cause severe epidemics and pandemics. The polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2) of the influenza virus plays a crucial role in the viral replication process, making the CAP-binding domain of PB2 an attractive target for antiviral drug development. This study aimed to identify and evaluate potential inhibitors of the influenza polymerase PB2 CAP-binding domain using computational drug discovery methods. We employed a comprehensive computational approach involving virtual screening, molecular docking, and 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Compounds were selected from the Diverse lib database and assessed for their binding affinity and stability in interaction with the PB2 CAP-binding domain. The study utilized the generalized amber force field (GAFF) for MD simulations to further evaluate the dynamic behaviour and stability of the interactions. Among the screened compounds, compounds 1, 3, and 4 showed promising binding affinities. Compound 4 demonstrated the highest binding stability and the most favourable free energy profile, indicating strong and consistent interaction with the target domain. Compound 3 displayed moderate stability with dynamic conformational changes, while Compound 1 maintained robust interactions throughout the simulations. Comparative analyses of these compounds against a control compound highlighted their potential efficacy. Compound 4 emerged as the most promising inhibitor, with substantial stability and strong binding affinity to the PB2 CAP-binding domain. These findings suggest that compound 4, along with compounds 1 and 3, holds the potential for further development into effective antiviral agents against influenza. Future studies should focus on experimental validation of these compounds and exploration of resistance mechanisms to enhance their therapeutic utility.

Keywords: Free binding energy; Free energy landscape; Influenza virus; Molecular dynamics simulations; PB2 CAP-binding domain; Virtual screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 3D and 2D structure of the selected compound in complex with the protein (a, b) compound 1, (c, d) compound 2, (e, f) compound 3, (g, h) compound 4 and (i, j) control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 2D structure of the selected compound in complex with the protein (a, b) compound 1, (c, d) compound 2, (e, f) compound 3, (g, h) compound 4 and (i, j) control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
RMSD analysis of protein in complex with three selected compounds protein (a) compound 1, (b) compound 3, (c) compound 4 and the (d) control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
RMSD analysis of three selected ligand (a) compound 1, (b) compound 3, (c) compound 4 and the (d) control in complex with protein.
Figure 5
Figure 5
RMSF analysis of protein in complex with three selected compounds (a) compound 1, (b) compound 3, (c) compound 4 and the (d) control.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Hydrogen bond analysis of three compounds in complex with protein (a) compound 1, (b) compound 3, (c) compound 4 and the (d) control.
Figure 7
Figure 7
RG-RMSD based free energy landscape analysis of three compounds in complex with protein (a) compound 1, (b) compound 3, (c) compound 4 and the (d) control.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Superimposed representation of three selected compounds in complex with the target protein (a) compound 1 (b) compound 3 (c) compound 4 and (d) control.

References

    1. WHO, Influenza (Seasonal) (2023). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/influenza-(seasonal)?ga... (accessed April 21, 2024).
    1. PAHO, Influenza, SARS-CoV-2, RSV and other respiratory viruses, (n.d.). https://www.paho.org/en/topics/influenza-sars-cov-2-rsv-and-other-respir... (accessed April 21, 2024).
    1. Russell, C. J. Orthomyxoviruses: Structure of Antigens☆. In Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences (Elsevier, 2016). 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.95721-0
    1. te Velthuis, A. J. W. & Fodor, E. Influenza virus RNA polymerase: Insights into the mechanisms of viral RNA synthesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14, 479–493. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.87 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graef, K. M. et al. The PB2 subunit of the influenza virus RNA polymerase affects virulence by interacting with the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein and inhibiting expression of beta interferon. J. Virol.84, 8433–8445. 10.1128/JVI.00879-10 (2010). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /