This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log in
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;13(5):220121.
doi: 10.1098/rsob.220121. Epub 2023 May 10.

Delay eyeblink conditioning performance and brain-wide c-Fos expression in male and female mice

Affiliations

Delay eyeblink conditioning performance and brain-wide c-Fos expression in male and female mice

Maria Roa Oyaga et al. Open Biol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Delay eyeblink conditioning has been extensively used to study associative learning and the cerebellar circuits underlying this task have been largely identified. However, there is a little knowledge on how factors such as strain, sex and innate behaviour influence performance during this type of learning. In this study, we used male and female mice of C57BL/6J (B6) and B6CBAF1 strains to investigate the effect of sex, strain and locomotion in delay eyeblink conditioning. We performed a short and a long delay eyeblink conditioning paradigm and used a c-Fos immunostaining approach to explore the involvement of different brain areas in this task. We found that both B6 and B6CBAF1 females reach higher learning scores compared to males in the initial stages of learning. This sex-dependent difference was no longer present as the learning progressed. Moreover, we found a strong positive correlation between learning scores and voluntary locomotion irrespective of the training duration. c-Fos immunostainings after the short paradigm showed positive correlations between c-Fos expression and learning scores in the cerebellar cortex and brainstem, as well as previously unreported areas. By contrast, after the long paradigm, c-Fos expression was only significantly elevated in the brainstem. Taken together, we show that differences in voluntary locomotion and activity across brain areas correlate with performance in delay eyeblink conditioning across strains and sexes.

Keywords: c-Fos; eyeblink; learning; locomotion; sex; strain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
B6 female and male mice show comparable variability in eyeblink conditioning and females reach higher learning scores faster. (a) Experimental set-up. Mouse with an implanted headplate is head-fixed on top of a freely rotating wheel. A blue light (CS) is presented 250 ms before a puff (US) to the same eye. In a trained mouse, the CS produces an anticipatory eyelid closure (CR), followed by a blink reflex triggered by the US (UR). (b) Paired trials average traces in females and males during the short (5-day) paradigm. The CR progressively develops due to the CS–US pairing. (c,d) CR percentage and amplitude in CS-only trials over the short (c) and long (10-day) (d) paradigm. Inset shows average response in CS-only trials on day 5 of training. Purple, females; green, males; shaded area, s.e.m. (e) Mean percentage and amplitude response in CS-only trials, comparing the performance of the cohorts used in the short and long paradigms. Differences between female and male performance are no longer detected on day 10. Purple, females (n = 14 short, n = 8 long); green, males (n = 14 short, n = 7 long); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Learning scores correlate with spontaneous locomotor activity. (a,b) CR amplitude and speed of the right back paw over training sessions for the short (i) and long (ii) training paradigms. Purple, females (n = 14 short, n = 8 long); green, males (n = 14 short, n = 7 long); shaded area, s.e.m. Speed: two-way ANOVA for sex and session ×ばつ sex effect short paradigm: F1,26 = 12.17, p = 0.0017; sex effect long paradigm F1,13 = 7.81, p = 0.02. (c) Positive correlation between CR amplitude and speed of the right back paw on the last session of training (linear regression: short paradigm R2 = 0.75, p = 0.002; long paradigm R2 = 0.72, p < 0.0001).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Learning scores correlate with c-Fos expression. (a) c-Fos positive granule cells in lobule VI in the cerebellum. (b) Cerebellar areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude (crus 1: tau = 0.42, p = 0.042, simplex: tau = 0.52, p = 0.009, lobule VI: tau = 0.8, p = 0.009). (c) Three-dimensional model with significant areas highlighted. (d) c-Fos positive cells in the inferior olive. (e) Brainstem areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude (red nucleus: tau = 0.43, p = 0.041, facial nucleus: tau = 0.57, p = 0.006, inferior olive: tau = 0.76, p = 0.0008, pontine nuclei: tau = 0.48, p = 0.021). (f) Three-dimensional model with significant areas highlighted. (g) Brainstem areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude in the long paradigm (red nucleus: tau = 0.46, p = 0.04), facial nucleus: tau = 0.47, p = 0.03, inferior olive: tau = 0.52, p = 0.02, pontine nuclei: tau = 0.52, p = 0.02). (h) c-Fos positive cells in the visual cortex. (i) Cortical areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude (visual cortex: tau = 0.51, p = 0.013, motor cortex: tau = 0.69, p = 0.0003, somatosensory cortex: 0.54, p = 0.007, amygdala: tau = 0.63, p: 0.001). (j) Three-dimensional model with significant areas highlighted.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Pseudoconditioned mice show lower c-Fos expression compared to high and low learners. (a) Change in CR amplitude and speed of the right back paw of pseudoconditioned mice over training sessions for the short (top; n = 8) and long (bottom; n = 3) paradigms. CR amplitude in the left y-axis and speed in the right y-axis. (b) Boxplots depict c-Fos density in high learners (CR amplitude > 0.4 on last session; n = 14 short paradigm, n = 13 long paradigm), low learners (CR amplitude < 0.4 on last session; n = 14 short paradigm, n = 2 long paradigm) and pseudoconditioned mice on the short (top) and long (bottom) paradigm. (c) Representative immunofluorescent images of c-Fos positive cells in a pseudocontidoned mouse (left) and a high-learner mouse (right). Top to bottom: cerebellar cortex, motor cortex, somatosensory cortex. Scale bar: 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, #p < 0.0001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Correlation between learning scores and c-Fos expression is consistent in B6CBAF1 mice. (a) CR percentage in CS only trials over training sessions. Yellow, females (n = 9); cyan, males (n = 7); shaded area, s.e.m. (b) CR amplitude in CS only trials over training sessions. Shaded area, s.e.m. (c) c-Fos positive cells in lobule VI. (d) Cerebellar areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude in high learners (crus 1: tau = 0.82, p = 0.0001, simplex: tau = 0.7, p = 0.005, lobule VI: tau = 0.75, p = 0.0007). (e) c-Fos positive cells in the inferior olive. (f) Brainstem areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude in high learners (inferior olive: tau = 0.85, p = 0.0004, pontine nuclei: tau = 0.78, p = 0.0003). (g) c-Fos positive cells in the visual cortex. (h) Cortical areas with a significant positive correlation between c-Fos positive cell density and CR amplitude in high learners (visual cortex: tau = 0.64, p = 0.0057, motor cortex: tau = 0.75, p = 0.0008, somatosensory cortex: tau = 0.6, p = 0.009).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Strain and sex variability. High learners were selected based on CR amplitude on the last training session> 0.4. CV = s.d./mean. (a) For strains: B6, n = 14, B6CBAF1, n = 11. (b) For B6 mice: males, n = 5; females, n = 9. (c) For B6CBAF1 mice: males, n = 3; females, n = 8. (d) For the B6 long paradigm: males, n = 6; females, n = 7. VC, visual cortex; MC, motor cortex; SSM, somatosensory cortex; CV, coefficient of variation.

References

    1. Krupa DJ, Thompson JK, Thompson RF. 1993. Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. Science 260, 989-991. (10.1126/science.8493536) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ten Brinke MM, Heiney SA, Wang X, Proietti-Onori M, Boele HJ, Bakermans J, Medina JF, Gao Z, De Zeeuw CI. 2017. Dynamic modulation of activity in cerebellar nuclei neurons during pavlovian eyeblink conditioning in mice. eLife 6, e28132. (10.7554/eLife.28132) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hesslow G, Ivarsson M. 1996. Inhibition of the inferior olive during conditioned responses in the Decerebrate Ferret. Exp. Brain Res. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation Cerebrale 110, 36-46. (10.1007/BF00241372) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiménez-Díaz L, Gruart A, Miñano FJ, Delgado-García JM. 2007. Extracellular amino acid levels in the interpositus nucleus during classical eyeblink conditioning in alert cats. Behav. Neurosci. 121, 1106-1112. (10.1037/0735-7044.121.5.1106) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmajuk NA, Christiansen BA. 1990. Eyeblink conditioning in rats. Physiol. Behav. 48, 755-758. (10.1016/0031-9384(90)90221-O) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /