Mitotic recombination events and single-base mutations induced by ultraviolet light in G1-arrested yeast cells
Ying-Xuan Zhu
Ke-Jing Li
Min He
Ke Zhang
Dao-Qiong Zheng
Thomas D Petes
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: zhengdaoqiong@zju.edu.cn or tom.petes@duke.edu.
Contributed by Thomas D. Petes; received July 8, 2025; accepted September 15, 2025; reviewed by Martin Kupiec and Anna Malkova
Received 2025 Jul 8; Accepted 2025 Sep 15; Issue date 2025 Oct 21.
This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
Significance
Ultraviolet light (UV) contributes to mutations in all free-living organisms, including humans. We examine two important features of UV-induced mutations in yeast. First, we show that almost all such mutations are a consequence of repair of the UV-damaged chromosome rather than a trans effect (for example, production of reactive oxygen) allowing mutations to form on unirradiated chromosomes in the same cell. Second, we find that most UV-induced mutations in nondividing yeast cells are fixed within both strands of the duplex before DNA replication. These observations contribute to our understanding of the rate of genome evolution in organisms exposed to UV and of the development of mutations in nondividing cells such as the skin cells that can give rise to melanomas.
Keywords: UV-induced mutagenesis, UV-induced recombination, mutagenesis in nondividing yeast cells, mechanism of UV mutagenesis
Abstract
Ultraviolet light (UV) is a potent inducer of both single-base mutations and mitotic recombination. Although these genomic alterations are often attributed to the action of error-prone DNA polymerases on UV-induced DNA lesions during replicative DNA synthesis, UV damage can also result in mutagenic and recombinogenic DNA damage in nondividing cells. We examined the effects of UV on cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae arrested in G1 of the cell cycle. By mating an irradiated haploid with an unirradiated haploid, we found that recombination was initiated only on the irradiated chromosome. This result indicates that trans effects of UV on recombination (for example, induction of recombinogenic proteins stimulating DNA breaks on the unirradiated homolog) are small or negligible. In addition, we show that most of the UV-induced mutations produced in G1-irradiated cells result in mutations at identical positions in both strands of the duplex. As observed for recombination events, mutations are almost exclusively on the irradiated chromosome, indicating the near absence of a trans effect on mutations.
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ultraviolet radiation (UV) is a potent inducer of both mutations and mitotic recombination (1, 2). Although many of the details of the mechanisms that generate mutations and recombination are understood, there are still phenomena related to the effects of UV on the genome that are unclear. In this study, we examine two of them. The first observation is that mitotic recombination can be induced by UV on chromosomes that have not been irradiated (3). The second is that UV can induce mutations on both DNA strands within a gene in cells arrested in G1 of the cell cycle.
Induction of Mitotic Recombination by UV.
UV-induced mitotic recombination likely reflects a variety of mechanisms related to the DNA lesion produced by UV. The primary lesions caused by UV are cyclobutene pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproducts (4). Removal of these lesions by nucleotide excision repair (NER) creates a small single-stranded gap, and replication of a gapped strand before its repair can result in a double-stranded break (DSB) (5). In addition, nicks rather than DSBs can initiate recombination (reviewed in ref. 6). In G1-arrested cells, high doses of UV can produce DSBs without requiring DNA replication, possibly resulting from NER-associated repair of bulky lesions located closely together on opposite strands of the duplex (7). Last, since NER-generated lesions can result in stalled replication forks that are susceptible to DSB formation, replication-associated recombinogenic lesions can be formed during DNA replication (reviewed in ref. 8).
Two types of mitotic recombination events can be induced by UV: reciprocal crossovers and gene conversions (9). One method of distinguishing these two mechanisms is to use diploid strains that are heterozygous for many single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (10). In Fig. 1, we show the patterns of recombination detected by DNA sequence analysis of the daughter cells generated following mitotic exchange. A genetic system that allows identification of the reciprocal products of crossovers by the formation of red/white sectors was described by St. Charles and Petes (10). Diploids used in this analysis are homozygous for an ochre mutation in ade2-1 and heterozygous for the SUP4-o ochre suppressor (Fig. 1A). If unsuppressed, such strains form red colonies. In strains with one or two copies of SUP4-o (an ochre suppressor) form pink and white colonies, respectively. Thus, the products of reciprocal crossovers between SUP4-o and the centromere can be identified as red/white sectors and each sector can be sequenced to determine the breakpoints of the recombination event.
Fig. 1.
Patterns of LOH associated with various types of mitotic recombination as identified in daughter cells by a sectoring assay. In diploid strains that are heterozygous for an insertion of the SUP4 ochre suppressor and homozygous for the ade2-1 ochre mutation, strains that lose the ochre suppressor as a consequence of mitotic recombination form red colonies and those that duplicate the suppressor form white colonies. Chromatids or chromosomes derived from different genetic backgrounds are shown as red lines (W303 background) and blue lines (YJM789 background); centromeres are shown as ovals or circles. The black horizontal lines show the position of SUP4 on chromosome IV. (A) Reciprocal crossover between CEN4 and SUP4. A red/white sectored colony is produced with reciprocal patterns of LOH marking the position of the crossover. (B) Gene conversion event producing an interstitial LOH event without an associated crossover. Such an event does not produce a red/white sectored colony, but can be detected by whole-genome sequencing. (C) Reciprocal crossover associated with a region of gene conversion. Associated with the repair of the DSB on the red chromosome is a 3:1 gene conversion event (indicated by dotted lines) associated with the crossover. (D) DSB in G1 cell, followed by repair of the broken chromosomes resulting in conversion tracts of equal lengths. The resulting broken chromatids were repaired to produce a 4:0 gene conversion event. (E) DSB in G1 cell, followed by repair of the broken chromosomes resulting in conversion tracts of unequal lengths. The resulting repair leads to a 3:1/4:0 hybrid conversion tract. (F) DSB in G1 cell, leading to 4:0 conversion tract associated with a crossover.
Mitotic crossovers result in loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of all SNPs distal to the site of exchange (terminal LOH, T-LOH) as shown in Fig. 1A. In gene conversion events (Fig. 1B), DNA sequences are transferred into the broken chromosome using the unbroken chromosome as a template. Gene conversion events unassociated with a crossover produce an interstitial region of LOH (I-LOH). In addition, conversion events are frequently associated with crossovers as shown in Fig. 1C. In Fig. 1 A–C, we show a DSB on only one of the four chromatids. Considering all four chromatids in the two sectors, repair of a single DSB results in three chromatids with one SNP allele and one chromatid with one SNP allele (3:1 segregation, Fig. 1B). In contrast, if a DSB occurs in G1 and the broken chromosome is replicated, repair of two broken chromatids results in a 4:0 or hybrid 3:1/4:0 gene conversion tracts (Fig. 1 D–F). In S. cerevisiae, although mitotic recombination events can be induced throughout the cell cycle, most (about two-thirds) of spontaneous mitotic recombination events involving homologs are initiated in G1 (10).
The mechanisms by which recombination is stimulated by DNA damaging agents can be divided into two classes: recombinogenic lesions formed on the DNA that initiate exchange with undamaged templates (cis induction) and treatment with DNA damaging agents promote the initiation of recombination events even on chromosomes that were not exposed to the damaging agents (trans induction) (11). The cis induction of recombination in yeast is well documented through studies of DSBs induced by sequence-specific endonucleases, recombination hotspots, and other approaches (12, 13). In contrast, although DNA damage induces the production of enzymes that are potentially involved in DNA repair and recombination (14), the contribution of trans effects on the frequency of recombination is less clear. Fabre and Roman (3) showed that high doses of UV in a MATα haploid, when mated to an unirradiated MATa/MATa diploid, could stimulate recombination in the unirradiated chromosomes. In this study, however, the relative contribution of cis and trans effects to the frequency of recombination was not measured.
Using a different approach, Silberman and Kupiec (15) transformed a plasmid containing a his3 gene with two mutations (his3-RS21 and his3-RS84) into a diploid that had his3-RS21 on one homolog and his3-RS84 on the other. They found that His+ transformants were stimulated if the plasmid had a DSB within the his3 gene but not if the DSB was within regions of nonhomology. This observation supported the conclusion that the His+ recombinants were the result of a triparental recombination rather than a trans activation of recombination by the DSB. One difference between the Fabre and Roman experiments and those performed by Silberman and Kupiec is that the Fabre and Roman experiments involved the use of high doses of UV instead of the single DSB used by Silberman and Kupiec. In the current research, we show that the trans induction of recombination does not have a major role in UV-induced recombination.
UV-Induced Mutagenesis.
Different UV wavelengths can produce different mutational spectra (for example, ref. 16); our study is limited to UVC which characteristically produces C to T changes in cytosine-containing dipyrimidine sequences (TC, CT, or CC); tandem alterations of CC to TT are also observed, although less common than the single-base mutations (reviewed in ref. 17). In one study of UV-induced mutations in G1-arrested cells (18), T to A and T to C mutations were also elevated. In this study and others (19), most UV-induced mutagenesis is dependent on the error-prone DNA polymerase zeta (ζ). Although mutagenic by-pass of UV-induced damage may occur during the S-period, mutations are induced more efficiently in G1-arrested yeast cells than in log-phase cells (18).
Error-prone bypass of bulky UV-induced lesions during the S-period would be expected to produce a mutation in the newly replicated DNA strand. However, several studies showed that UV treatment of nondividing yeast cells can result in mutations in both strands of the assayed gene (20–22). The assay used in two of the studies (20, 22) is shown in Fig. 2. G1-arrested haploid cells with the ade2 mutation were treated with UV and then immediately plated on rich growth medium. Although ade2 strains form red colonies because of accumulation of a pigmented adenine precursor, a mutation in a gene earlier in the adenine synthesis pathway (adeX indicating the ade4, ade5,7, ade8, ade3, or ade6 genes) results in white colonies (Fig. 2A). If the UV treatment resulted in a mutation in only one of the strands in one of the target adeX genes, one would expect to generate a red/white sectored colony, whereas if both strands of the adeX gene were mutated then a pure white colony would be formed (Fig. 2B). Kozmin and Jinks-Robertson found that pure white colonies (reflecting two-strand mutations, TSMs) were sixfold more frequent than red/white sectored colonies (reflecting one-strand mutations, OSMs). In addition, they showed that TSMs were greatly reduced in strains with mutations required for error-prone bypass of UV damage (for example, REV3 encoding the catalytic subunit of Pol ζ), for nucleotide excision repair (for example, RAD1) and for the early steps of the DNA damage checkpoint (for example, MEC1). However, mutations eliminating DNA mismatch repair, Pol eta, and downstream DNA-damage checkpoint genes did not affect the frequency of TSMs.
Fig. 2.
Depiction of the system used by Eckardt and Haynes (20) and Kozmin and Jinks-Robertson (22) to detect two-strand mutations. Circles indicate colonies. (A) Mutations in the ADE2 or ADE1 gene of the adenine biosynthetic pathway result in red colonies. Double mutations in ADE genes earlier in the pathway result in white colonies. (B) Two- and one-strand mutations induced by UV. These strains are homozygous for the ade2 mutation. The lines with arrows represent single strands of the DNA duplex. After treatment with UV, if a single cell acquires a mutation in both strands of an ade gene that acts prior to the ade2 gene (adeX), it will form an unsectored white colony (Left side of figure). If it results in a mutation in only one strand, a red/white sectored colony would be formed (Right side of figure).
The results cited above were interpreted (reasonably!) as suggesting that both the Watson and Crick strands of the UV-induced mutants were altered at the same position in both strands of the unidentified adeX gene. However, since the UV-generated adeX genes were not identified in these studies, the position and nature of the mutations could not be established by DNA sequencing. It was possible, therefore, that the UV treatment generated one or more mutations on both strands of the adeX gene but these mutations were at different positions within the gene. In our study, we used a method of investigating TSMs that allows us to conclude that these UV-induced mutations are at identical positions on both strands and that these mutations have the spectrum expected for UV-induced mutations.
Results
Two types of experiments were done. The first class (using the diploid YZ1) was designed to determine whether diploids formed by irradiating one haploid parent could induce recombination initiated on a chromosome derived from an unirradiated haploid parent. The purpose of the second class of experiments (using the diploid YZ2) was to determine whether haploids irradiated in G1-arrested cells have one-strand or two-strand mutations. In both types of experiments, we investigated both mutations and chromosome rearrangements induced by UV.
System Used to Detect Genomic Rearrangements Induced in trans by UV in the Diploid YZ1.
One system that was used to determine whether UV could stimulate recombination on an unirradiated chromosome is shown in Fig. 3. The haploid yeast strain K0171 (MATa can1-100 trp1-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 ura3Δ::loxP-KanMX-loxP IV1495420::loxP-URA3Kl-loxP; W303 genetic background) was synchronized in G1 with alpha factor, and the cells were then plated on rich growth medium on three sets of plates. One set of plates was not irradiated, and the two other plates were UV-irradiated with doses of either 20 or 80 J/m2 (details in Materials and Methods). The survival percentages of KO171 haploid cells at these doses were 36% and 0.3%, respectively. Following irradiation, the cells were immediately mated to the unirradiated strain KO124 of the opposite mating type (MATα ade2∆::kanMX ura3 ho::hisG gal2 IV1495420::ADE2; YJM789 background).
Fig. 3.
Experimental protocol used to determine whether a UV-irradiated chromosome could stimulate recombination or mutations in an unirradiated chromosome. Following UV treatment (20 or 80 J/m2), a G1-arrested MATa haploid was immediately mated to an unirradiated haploid of the opposite mating type. After 4 h, the mated cells were replica-plated to a medium on which only diploids could form colonies. Following single-colony purification, we sequenced the genomes of independent derivatives. The genetic backgrounds of the haploids were different (55,000 heterozygous SNPs), allowing us to map recombination events leading to LOH to high resolution.
Following 4 h of mating, the cells were replica-plated to SD minimal medium which selects for diploids (YZ1) and against both haploid parents. Relative to the diploids generated by mating two unirradiated haploids, the levels of survival for mating the irradiated haploid to the unirradiated haploid were about 45% for 20 J/m2 and about 4% for 80 J/m2. Thus, survival of the cells irradiated with 80 J/m2 was improved about 10-fold by mating. Cells were single-colony purified from independent diploid isolates and whole-genome sequencing was performed.
Analysis of genomic rearrangements induced by UV in the diploid YZ1.
The two haploid strains used to generate the diploid YZ1 differ by about 55,000 SNPs allowing us to detect mitotic recombination events and other genomic alterations throughout the genome at high resolution (7, 10). We performed whole-genome sequencing on 22 individual isolates each from YZ1 in which the haploid parent was treated with either 20 J/m2 (YZ1-20) or 80 J/m2 (YZ1-80). Before sequencing, we did single-colony purifications from each of the original colonies. The sequences for all 44 of these isolates are available online (SRA database, with the accession number PRJNA1249510). The numbers and rates of various types of genomic alterations in the YZ1-20 and YZ1-80 are summarized in Table 1. The coordinates of the LOH breakpoints and other relevant details of the genomic alterations are shown in Dataset S1-1 and S1-2.
Table 1.
Numbers and rates of UV-induced LOH events and mutations in YZ1
| Genome alteration* | Rate for WT (no UV)† | 20 J/m† UV dose | 80 J/m† UV dose | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number‡ | Rate§ | Fold vs. WT¶ | Number‡ | Rate§ | Fold vs. WT¶ | ||
|
Simple I-LOH |
2.9E-03 |
23 [23 W; 0 Y] |
1.0E+00 | 361 |
84 [80 W; 4 Y] |
3.8E+00 | 1,317 |
|
Complex I-LOH |
3.6E-04 | 5 | 2.3E-01 | 631 | 28 | 1.3E+00 | 3,535 |
|
Simple T-LOH# |
1.1E-03 | 2 | 9.1E-02 | 83 | 24 | 1.1E+00 | 992 |
|
Complex T-LOH |
2.8E-04 | 2 | 9.1E-02 | 325 | 16 | 7.3E-01 | 2,597 |
|
Simple I-DEL |
1.0E-04 | 0 | ND | ND | 5 [5 W; 0 Y] | 2.3E-01 | 2,273 |
|
Simple I-DUP |
2.7E-05 | 0 | ND | ND | 2 [2 W; 0 Y] | 9.1E-02 | 3,367 |
|
Simple T-DEL |
1.9E-05 | 0 | ND | ND | 7 [7 W; 0 Y] | 3.2E-01 | 16,746 |
|
Simple T-DUP |
1.1E-05 | 0 | ND | ND | 8 [7 W; 1 Y] | 3.6E-01 | 33,058 |
| Complex DEL/DUP | 1.9E-05 | 0 | ND | ND | 2 | 9.1E-02 | 4,785 |
| Aneuploidy and UPD|| | 6.4E-05 | 1 | 4.5E-02 | 710 | 13 | 5.9E-01 | 9,233 |
| Single-base mutations | 4.8E-03 | 84 | 3.8E+00 | 795 | 449 | 2.0E+01 | 4,252 |
| Complex mutations** | 4.5E-05 | 3 | 1.4E-01 | 3030 | 24 | 1.1E+00 | 24,242 |
| Small in/dels (<100 bp) | 2.7E-04 | 4 | 1.8E-01 | 673 | 11 | 5.0E-01 | 1,852 |
*The various types of genomic alterations are described in the text and listed in Dataset S1. Events described as "Simple I-LOH" have a single region of LOH flanked by heterozygous SNPs; "Simple" T-LOH events have a single breakpoint for an LOH region that extends to the end of the chromosome. Complex LOH events have multiple transitions between heterozygous regions and LOH regions, or LOH regions derived from both homologs.
†Rates of spontaneous alterations (WT, no UV) were determined by Sui et al. (23).
‡Numbers of events in each category of genomic change. Numbers in brackets indicate number of events in which the event involves duplication of YJM789-associated SNPs and deletion of W303-associated SNPs (W) and duplication of the W303-associated SNPs and deletion of the YJM789-associated SNPs (Y). Although we classified some classes of events as initiated from the W303- or YJM789-derived homologs, because of ambiguities in the mechanisms that produce complex events, these events were not so classified. In addition, simple T-LOH events could not be classified unambiguously.
§Rates were calculated as the number of events divided by the number of isolates (22 for each UV dose). In categories in which no alterations were observed, we did not calculate a rate as indicated by ND (Not Done).
¶Fold changes were calculated as the rates of UV-induced alterations divided by the WT rates.
#Since a reciprocal crossover will produce daughter cells with reciprocal types of simple T-LOH, we cannot determine which homolog had the recombinogenic DSB.
||The aneuploid isolates are missing a chromosome, have an extra chromosome, or have lost one homolog and duplicated the other (UPD, uniparental disomy). There were totals of seven monosomes, six trisomes, and one UPD event, summing both doses.
**Complex mutations are two or more single-base alterations that are less than 6 bp apart.
As expected from our previous studies and those of others, UV treatment greatly elevated the rates of many types of genetic changes. The rates of most genomic alterations were elevated several hundred- to several thousand-fold relative to the rates observed spontaneously (23). In addition, the rates observed in the cells irradiated with 80 J/m2 were 5- to 10-fold higher than found in cells irradiated with 20 J/m2. Although LOH events can result from either large deletions or mitotic recombination events (gene conversions and crossovers), in yeast, most LOH events reflect mitotic recombination (10). Large deletions result in loss of one type of allelic SNP without duplication of the other, whereas, in yeast, most LOH events represent loss of one type of allelic SNP and duplication of the other type. This distinction can be made by determining DNA sequence coverage of the heterozygous SNPs. No LOH events, large deletions/duplications, or single-base mutations were found in isogenic diploids (YZ1-0) made by crossing two unirradiated strains (one isolate examined by whole-genome sequencing and three analyzed with SNP-specific microarrays (10). The chromosome locations of all recombination events observed with YZ1 are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S1.
As shown in Fig. 1, both I-LOH and T-LOH are a consequence of the repair of DNA breaks using the unbroken homolog as a template. We and others showed that interstitial deletions (I-DEL) and duplications (I-DUP) are a consequence of crossovers between nonallelic repeats (such as the Ty1 transposons) located within a chromosome. Terminal duplications (T-DUP) and terminal deletions (T-DEL) are the result of recombination between nonallelic repeats located on nonhomologous chromosomes (23, 24). Extra chromosomes (trisomy) are likely a consequence of chromosome nondisjunction whereas monosomy could reflect either nondisjunction or failure to repair a DSB (25). Examples of various types of genomic alterations as assayed by sequence coverage are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Examples of LOH events diagnosed by DNA sequence coverage in YZ1 strains. Whole genomes were sequenced with >100-fold coverage. For each heterozygous SNP, the number of reads was divided by the average number of reads for SNPs assayed throughout the genome to yield the ratio on the Y-axis. The coordinates on the X-axis are based on the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD). The blue and red colors represent YJM789- and W303-specific SNP reads, respectively. (A) I-LOH event. This pattern is consistent with a gene conversion event with a 7 kb tract. (B) I-DEL. This 230 kb deletion of W303-derived sequences had directly oriented Ty elements at the breakpoints of the deletion. (C) T-LOH event. This pattern is consistent with either a reciprocal mitotic crossover or a BIR. (D) Monosomy. This figure shows the pattern expected for loss of the W303-derived chromosome III homolog.
In the construction of YZ1, KO171 (the W303-related haploid) was irradiated and KO124 (the YJM789-related haploid) was unirradiated. The most critical class of LOH events relevant to the possibility that the irradiated chromosome can stimulate recombination in the unirradiated chromosome is the simple I-LOH event. As shown in Fig. 1B, an event initiated on the irradiated chromosome would result in an I-LOH event in which sequences from the irradiated chromosome are lost and those of the unirradiated chromosome are duplicated. As shown in Table 1, among the 107 simple I-LOH events observed in YZ1, 103 were initiated on the irradiated W303-derived homolog and only 4 were initiated on the YJM789-derived homology. Thus, we conclude that the level of trans induction of events on the unirradiated chromosome by the irradiated chromosome is very low or absent, and the UV-induced stimulation of mitotic recombination is primarily a consequence of a cis induction by recombinogenic lesions on the irradiated chromosome.
The small number of I-LOH events that initiated on the unirradiated chromosome may represent a minor degree of trans stimulation or a low level of spontaneous mitotic recombination events. The predicted number of spontaneous mitotic recombination events among 44 isolates (based on the number expected from the analysis of ref. 23) is 44 ×ばつ 25 ×ばつ 3.3 ×ばつ 10−3 or 4. It should be emphasized that our findings do not necessarily contradict those of Fabre and Roman, since their study did not examine the ratio of cis to trans induction of recombination. Finally, the bias in the initiation events of the W303- and YJM789-derived homologs cannot be explained by a tendency for one homolog to be more recombination-prone than the other. In experiments in which a G1-arrested diploid with a closely related background to YZ1 was irradiated, simple I-LOH events were initiated at similar frequencies from both types of homologs; 0.53 from the W303-derived homolog and 0.47 from the YJM789-derived homolog (7).
The other classes of LOH events that are relevant to the issue of trans recombination are the I-DEL and I-DUP classes. As discussed above, these classes are usually the result of unequal intrachromatid or sister-chromatid recombination between nonallelic repeats (reviewed in ref. 26). Adding these two classes together, we found seven events that deleted or duplicated W303-derived sequences and no events affecting the YJM789-derived sequences (Table 1), supporting the conclusion that most or all of the UV-stimulated LOH events are initiated on the irradiated chromosome.
Complex events were not used to calculate whether the irradiated or unirradiated chromosome initiated the genomic alteration. Complex events have multiple transitions between heterozygous SNPs and LOH regions and/or adjacent W303- and YJM789-derived LOH regions. Because these patterns could be produced by events initiating on either homolog, they were not included in our analysis. The complex LOH events (approximately one-quarter as frequent as the simple LOH events) are depicted in Datasets S1–S5.
SI Appendix, Fig. S2 summarizes the molecular mechanisms that produce gene conversion events and reciprocal crossovers. Both types of recombination are likely initiated by double-strand DNA breaks, followed by invasion of one broken end into the unbroken homolog. Simple LOH events (gene conversions) are primarily the result of heteroduplex formation between homologous sequences, followed by DNA synthesis. The invading end is then displaced, resulting in formation of a heteroduplex (Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing); repair of mismatches within the heteroduplex results in LOH. In conversion events associated with crossover, a double-Holliday junction is formed with two regions of heteroduplex. Cleavage of the junctions can result in a crossover associated with a conversion (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Complex patterns of LOH can result from "patchy" repair of mismatches within the heteroduplexes or formation of symmetric heteroduplexes by branch migration (7, 10).
Last, we observed a UV-induced increase in aneuploidy in YZ1 (Table 1). This observation needs confirmation for two reasons. The number of events is small (only one event in cells exposed to 20 J/m2). In addition, 5 of the 13 events in the cells exposed to 80 J/m2 were observed in a single isolate.
Analysis of mutations induced by UV in YZ1.
In addition to gross genomic alterations, the sequencing experiments also allowed us to determine the rate of single-base alterations, small (less than 100 bp) in/dels, and complex mutations (more than one mutation within a 6 bp window) induced by UV (Table 1). Relative to the rate observed in unirradiated cells (23), mutations were greatly elevated (>500-fold), roughly proportional to the UV dose. All mutations observed in YZ1 are listed in Dataset S2, and the spectrum of single-base mutations is shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S3. As expected from previous studies (for example, refs. 17, 18, and 27), C->T/G->A, A->T/T->A, and A->G/T->C mutations were elevated relative to their spontaneous frequencies. The location of these mutations on the chromosomes is shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S4. The numbers of mutations per chromosome are approximately proportional to chromosome size (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) and there are no very strong mutation hotspots.
We also observed complex mutations in which two mutations were within 6 bp of each other (Dataset S2). 16 of these 28 complex events involved adjacent mutations. The three most common types were (NN representing any mutant bases): CC or GG to NN (8 events), CT or AG to NN (4 events), and GT or AC to NN (4 events). The first two classes were also the most common adjacent mutations observed by Vanderberg et al. (27). In summary, the UV-induced mutations observed in our study are very similar to those observed previously in other S. cerevisiae studies.
One final issue is whether UV irradiation of one haploid can induce mutations in an unirradiated haploid following mating. As discussed above, the diploids examined in our study are heterozygous for about 55,000 SNPs. In our experiments, the average length of the Illumina "reads" was about 150 bp. For 20 J/m2, of 42 events, 40 were on the W303 chromosome and 2 were on the YJM789 chromosome. For the 80 J/m2UV dose, of the 241 SNP-linked events, 239 events were on the W303 chromosome and two were on the YJM789 chromosome. Considering all SNP-linked mutations, 279 (99%) were linked to a W303 SNP (the irradiated haploid) and 4 (1%) were linked to a YJM789 SNP (Dataset S2). In summary, as observed for other types of genomic arrangements described above, the trans effect of UV irradiation on the induction of single-base mutations in the unirradiated chromosome is very small or absent, consistent with previous studies in wild-type yeast strains (28).
Genomic Alterations and Mutations Induced by UV in Sectored Colonies of the Diploid YZ2.
System for the analysis of both daughter cells containing the products of UV-induced recombination.
The YZ1 isolates were colonies that were unselected for LOH events. We next used a different diploid YZ2 in which we could monitor reciprocal mitotic crossovers on chromosome IV as well as unselected LOH events. For these experiments, we used a system similar to that described by Sui et al. (23). We crossed an irradiated haploid (Wspo11, relevant genotype: MATa ade2-1) to the unirradiated haploid SY166 (relevant genotype: MATα ade2-1 IV1510386::SUP4-o) using the same protocol as described above for YZ1; the resulting diploid is called YZ2. YZ2, like YZ1 is heterozygous for 55,000 SNPs, allowing high-resolution mapping of LOH events. As shown in Fig. 1, a crossover between the heterozygous SUP4-o mutation and the centromere can result in a red/white sectored colony. The analysis of sectored colonies allows detailed conclusions about the mechanism of the recombination events that were induced by UV, since the products of both daughter cells can be examined. For example, we could determine important features of the recombination event that cannot be examined by the examination of nonsectored colonies including: 1. Whether the event was initiated by a DSB formed in the irradiated G1 cell or a DSB generated during the subsequent S-period (G2 DSB), and 2. Whether T-LOH events are reciprocal crossovers or a product of break-induced replication (BIR) (10). Importantly, we can also infer details of unselected recombination and mutation events in daughter cells. As described below, this procedure also allowed us to unambiguously identify two-strand mutations induced by UV.
Analysis of genomic rearrangements induced by UV in the diploid YZ2.
As shown in Fig. 1, red/white sectored colonies in YZ2 are the result of reciprocal mitotic crossovers between a SUP4-o marker located near the right end of chromosome IV and CEN4. The frequencies of sectors (equivalent to the frequency of sectored colonies per total colonies) were 3.1 ×ばつ 10−5/genome in an unirradiated isogenic derivative of YZ2 (10), and 3.1 ×ばつ 10−3/genome (20 J/m2) and 3.9 ×ばつ 10−3/genome (80 J/m2) for irradiated cells. In the irradiated cells, these rates were the average of rates calculated for three independent experiments in which at least 1,000 colonies were examined for each UV dose. At both doses, the rates of recombination were elevated by UV roughly 100-fold, similar to the effects of UV in unsectored colonies of YZ1 (Table 1). It is likely that the sector frequency was not proportional to UV dosage in these experiments because the diploid cell viability was reduced to about 4% by the 80 J/m2 UV dose, resulting in a decreased probability of recovering the two daughter cells necessary to form a sectored colony. As discussed below, the numbers of LOH events in the sectored colonies were roughly proportional to the UV dose (Table 2).
Table 2.
Numbers and classes of UV-induced LOH events in sectored colonies of YZ2 diploids
| Class of genetic alteration* | Subtype | Description |
# for 20 J/m2 dose† [Rate/genome/cell division]‡ |
# for 80 J/m2 dose† [Rate/genome/cell division]§ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Class 1 (I-LOH without CO) |
1A | Simple 3:1 conversion, no CO |
12 (11 W303, 1 YJM789) [1.4E+00] |
43 (40 W303, 3 YJM789) [3.3E+00] |
| 1B | Simple 4:0 conversion, no CO |
4 (4 W303, 0 YJM789) [4E-01] |
42 (42 W303, 0 YJM789) [3.2E+00] |
|
| 1C |
3:1/4:0 or 3:1/2:2/3:1 conversion tract, no CO |
9 (9 W303, 0 YJM789) [1.0E+00] |
75 (75 W303, 0 YJM789) [5.8E+00] |
|
| 1D |
Other complex conversion tracts, no CO |
1 (ND) [1E-01] |
16 (1 W303, 15 ND) [1.2E+00] |
|
| Total Class 1 |
26 (24 W303, 1 YJM789, 1 ND) [2.9E+00] |
176 (158 W303, 3 YJM789, 15 ND) [1.4E+01] |
||
| Class 2 (CO with or without conversion | 2A | CO without conversion | 0 | 0 |
| 2B | Simple 3:1 conversion adjacent to CO |
4 (4 W303, 0 YJM789) [4E-01] |
5 (5 W303, 0 YJM789) [3.8E-01] |
|
| 2C | Simple 4:0 conversion adjacent to CO | 0 |
1 (1 W303, 0 YJM789) [8E-02] |
|
| 2D |
3:1/4:0 or 3:1/2:2/3:1 conversion tract with CO |
6 (6 W303, 0 YJM789) [7E-01] |
12 (12 W303, 0 YJM789) [9E-01] |
|
| 2E |
Other complex conversion tracts with CO |
4 (ND) [4E-01] |
20 (ND) [1.5E+00] |
|
| Total Class 2 |
14 (10 W303, 0 YJM789,4 ND) [1.6E-00] |
38 (18 W303, 0 YJM789, 20 ND) [2.9E-00] |
||
|
Class 3 (BIR + other events) |
Events with nonreciprocal T-LOH |
4 (2 W303, 0 YJM789, 2 ND) [4E-01] |
11 (9 W303, 1 YJM789, 1 ND)¶ [8E-01] |
|
|
Class 4 (Other LOH) |
Complex events with multiple transitions | 0 |
14 (10 W303, 0 YJM789, 4 ND) [1.1E-00] |
|
| Total all classes |
44 (36 W303, 1 YJM789, 7 ND) [4.9E-00] |
239 (195 W303, 4 YJM789, 40 ND) [1.8E+01] |
||
*Based on analysis of sectored colonies, the recombination events in YZ2 were classified into four classes. The chromosome locations of the events are in Dataset S1.3 and S1.4, and the definition of the classes and subtypes in the sectors are described in Dataset S3.
†The dose is given in units of Joules per square meter. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of events in which the event involves duplication of YJM789-associated SNPs and deletion of W303-associated SNPs ("W" indicating the recombination event was initiated on the W303-derived homology) or involves duplication of the W303-associated SNPs and deletion of the YJM789-associated SNPs ("Y" indicating the event was initiated on the YJM789-derived homolog). Complex LOH events have multiple transitions between heterozygous regions and LOH regions or LOH regions derived from both homologs. Events with regions derived from both homologs were classified as ND (not determined).
‡The numbers in brackets show the rate of each type of event/sectored colony. This rate was calculated by dividing the number of events by nine (the number of sectored colonies analyzed in cells exposed to 20 J/m2).
§The bracketed numbers show the rates of each type of event in cells exposed to 80 J/m2. The rates were calculated by dividing the number of events by 13, the number of sectored colonies analyzed.
¶In 5 of 11 of the BIR events observed with the 80 J/m2 dose, one sector had a T-LOH event and the other sector was heterozygous (Dataset S3). In 6 of 11 events, both sectors had the same type of T-LOH (duplication of YJM789-derived SNPs and deletion of W303-derived SNPs).
The patterns of LOH in the sectored colonies of YZ2 are shown in Dataset S3 and are summarized in Table 2; coordinates for LOH events are given in Dataset S1. The types of events are similar to those that we have observed previously in the analysis of sectored colonies resulting from spontaneous or UV-induced events (7, 10). Since red/white sectored colonies are generated by reciprocal crossovers on chromosome IV, all nine of the sectored colonies analyzed had such crossovers; most of these were associated with an adjacent region of gene conversion. In addition, there were many unselected recombination events with gene conversions unassociated with crossing-over (Class 1 in Table 2). As observed for the YZ1 strain, in Class 1 events in which the chromosome with the recombinogenic lesion could be identified, 98% (182/186) were located on the irradiated W303 chromosome, confirming that trans effects of UV on recombination are very rare or absent.
Because the sectors allow the analysis of all recombinant chromatids, gene conversions and crossovers can be analyzed throughout the genome in addition to the selected event on chromosome IV. As observed for YZ1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S1), the recombination events in YZ2 were found on all of the chromosomes with no pronounced hotspots (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). One relevant issue is whether the recombination events in our study are initiated in G1 or S/G2. These possibilities can be distinguished by examining the patterns of gene conversion in sectored colonies. As shown in Fig. 1 B and C, events resulting from a DSB in S/G2 would produce a 3:1 pattern of conversion (outlined in dotted lines). In contrast, following replication of chromosome broken in G1, DNA repair would be expected to induce a 4:0 conversion pattern (Fig. 1 D–F). If we divide the gene conversion events that are unassociated with crossovers (Class 1A-1C and Dataset S3) into those that have a 4:0 region of conversion and those that do not, about two-thirds of the events (121 of 185) reflect DSBs formed in G1. The DNA lesions that produce 3:1 conversion events may represent single-stranded nicks formed in G1 that result in one broken chromatid following DNA replication (5). The source of the G1-induced DSBs is not clear. It is possible that these DSBs result from the excision of two closely apposed dimers on opposite strands of the duplex, consistent with the observation that the ratio of 4:0 to 3:1 events is higher in cells with greater doses of UV (7).
In addition to 4:0 and 3:1 conversion events, we found conversion events in which 4:0 regions were adjacent to 3:1 tracts (Class 1C). Most such events can be explained by the independent repair of two DSBs with conversion tracts of different sizes (Fig. 1E). One striking observation is the abundance of conversion events (Class 1B) in which the endpoints of the 4:0 events are identical within resolution of the inter-SNP distances; this class is about half as frequent as the hybrid 3:1/4:0 tracts (Table 2). This result suggests that either the invading ends of the two broken DNA molecules catalyze DNA synthesis tracts of the same lengths during independent SDSA events or that the conversion event occurs between one broken DNA molecule and the unbroken template in G1. These possibilities will be discussed further below. In addition, we found some conversion events (for example, Classes 1D and 2E, Dataset S3.2) in which both the W303- and YJM789-derived chromosomes were donors in gene conversion events. Such events have been observed previously in UV-treated diploids and may reflect formation of symmetric heteroduplexes or template switching (7).
Another feature of mitotic recombination that is revealed by analysis of sectors is whether the T-LOH events are reciprocal (as expected for a crossover) or nonreciprocal (as expected for break-induced recombination [BIR]). In BIR events, the centromere-distal portion of the chromosome is lost, and the centromere-proximal end invades the homolog and copies sequences by a conservative type of DNA replication (29). As shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S7A, a reciprocal crossover produces sectored colonies with reciprocal patterns of T-LOH. A BIR event resulting from repair of a single broken sister chromatid would be expected to produce one sector with a T-LOH event and one sector without LOH (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). We also observed double BIR events in which the two sectors had nonreciprocal T-LOH events (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 C and D). There were 29 reciprocal crossovers (excluding the selected crossover on chromosome IV) and 15 BIR events (8 involving repair of a single DSB and 7 involving the repair of two DSBs). The greater fraction of reciprocal crossovers compared to BIR events was also observed for spontaneous events (30).
Analysis of mutations induced by UV in sectored colonies of the diploid YZ2: evidence for two-strand mutations.
We also examined UV-mutations induced in the sectored colonies of YZ2. The location and types of all mutations are given in Dataset S4. The very striking observation is that the red and white halves of individual colonies often had the same mutation. This observation argues that the mutation induced by UV in the irradiated haploid strain must have had the same mutation in both strands of the duplex, a two-strand mutation (TSM; Fig. 5). A mutation in only one of the two duplex strands (OSM) would result in a mutation in only one of the two sectors. Of 103 mutations observed in YZ2 in which the haploid parent was treated with 20 J/m2, 15 were OSM and 88 were TSM (80 involved single mutations and 8 involved two adjacent mutations). In the 80 J/m2 isolate, we detected 789 mutations: 652 were paired mutations (326 pairs) involving one base (TSM), 56 were two adjacent paired mutations (TSM), 78 were unpaired single mutations (OSM), and 3 were more complex mutations. Thus, of the mutations that were unambiguously classified as TSM or OSM for the 80 J/m2 data, 90% were two-strand mutations, very similar to the percentage observed in the 20 J/m2 sample (85%). Since one-strand mutations produce one sector with a mutation whereas two-strand mutants produce two mutant isolates (one in each sector), we conclude that the ratio of TSMs to OSMs is about 5:1. Mechanisms that may induce TSMs will be considered in Discussion.
Fig. 5.
Analysis of mutations in both daughter cells following irradiation: one- and two-strand mutations. This figure depicts the system used to diagnose one- vs. two-strand mutations in YZ2. This strain contains the heterozygous SUP4 mutation on chromosome IV that allows identification of the two daughter cells resulting from the first mitotic division of the diploid made by the mating of the irradiated and nonirradiated cells, since these cells form a red/white sectored colony. The paired red (W303-derived) and blue (YJM789-derived) vertical lines show the single strands of the duplex with arrows indicating the 3’ ends. (A) One-strand mutation. UV irradiation results in a C to T change in the haploid. When that strain is mated to the unirradiated strain, after the subsequent S-period and segregation of the replicated chromosomes, one cell will have one homolog with a mutation and one with the wild-type sequence. The other cell will be homozygous for the wild-type sequence. (B) Two-strand mutation. The UV irradiation mutates both strands at the same position. Following DNA replication and chromosome segregation, both daughter cells will have one homolog with the mutation and one with the wild-type sequence.
We also determined the mutation spectrum for the YZ2 isolates. The pattern of substitutions is similar to that observed for YZ1 and different from that observed in wild-type cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Significant elevations in the frequencies of C->T/G->A, A->T/T->A, and A->G/T->C were observed. We also examined separately the types of mutations in one-strand and two-strand mutations. For this analysis, the number of two-strand mutations was divided by two since each pair is a consequence of a single event. The types of mutation were broadly similar, although the C->T/G->A class was no longer significant for the one-strand mutations.
We also determined whether the UV-induced mutations were linked to SNPs on the irradiated W303-derived chromosome or the unirradiated YJM789-derived chromosome (Dataset S4). Almost all of the paired two-strand mutations were on the irradiated chromosomes (195 of 196 pairs), as well as 31 of 31 of the one-strand mutations, confirming the lack of a trans effect for UV-induced mutagenesis. As observed for mutations in YZ1, the YZ2 mutations (both OSM and TSM) were distributed over all chromosomes without very pronounced hotspots (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Although one possible difference between the OSM and TSM mutations could reflect the timing of DNA replication, no significant effect relationship was observed between the location of OSM and TSM mutations and early- and late-firing origins of replication (SI Appendix, Fig. S8).
Discussion
Our study shows that an irradiated haploid, when mated to an unirradiated haploid, does not induce recombinogenic lesions or mutations in the unirradiated chromosome. We also show that UV damage in a G1-arrested cell is repaired by a mechanism that generates mutations at the same position in both strands of the duplex and confirm that UV-induced damage of G1-arrested cells is a potent generator of chromosome rearrangements. These findings, taken together with earlier data, confirm the importance of DNA damage in G1-arrested cells in the generation of genomic variation.
cis and trans Effects of UV Irradiation.
Our results demonstrate that almost all mutations and recombinogenic DSBs are formed on the irradiated chromosome and the trans effect of UV irradiation (induction of mutations and/or recombinogenic DNA lesions on the nonirradiated chromosome) has a minor or no effect on mutagenesis or recombination. In contrast, Fabre and Roman (3) observed that mating a UV-treated haploid to an unirradiated diploid could stimulate heteroallelic recombination between the unirradiated chromosomes. It was pointed out by Silberman and Kupiec (15) that an alternative interpretation of these results was that the irradiated haploid engaged in triparental recombination events that would mimic a recombination event between the unirradiated diploid chromosomes. They also showed the existence of such triparental events. Thus, our favored interpretation is that trans induction of recombination by UV is minimal or absent relative to cis induction.
Possible Mechanisms for TSMs.
Our studies, as well as those of others (20–22), show that UV treatment of G0 or G1-arrested cells usually mutates both strands of the duplex. Our analysis demonstrates that the two mutations are at identical positions on the two strands instead of representing mutations at two different positions of the duplex. There are several models that could produce TSMs. Our preferred model (Model 1, Fig. 6A) hypothesizes that G1-arrested cells contain single-stranded gaps unrelated to the excision of UV damage. Since single-stranded DNA is more susceptible to UV-induced mutagenesis than double-stranded DNA (31), the mutations would be concentrated in these regions. Filling the single-stranded gaps by DNA polymerase zeta would introduce mutations opposite the DNA lesion, and subsequent NER would result in a two-stranded mutation.
Fig. 6.
Three models to explain two-strand mutations. (A) In Model 1, a single DNA lesion is introduced on a preexisting single-stranded DNA gap. The gap is filled in by an error-prone DNA polymerase, resulting in a mutation opposite the UV-induced DNA lesion. Removal of the DNA lesion by nucleotide-excision repair and gap filling produces the two-strand mutation. (B) In Model 2, similar to that proposed previously by Kozmin and Jinks-Robertson (22), UV induces two lesions (pyrimidine dimers) on opposite strands that are close together. One lesion is removed by nucleotide-excision repair resulting in a gap that includes the second lesion. The filling in of the gap by an error-prone DNA polymerase producing a mutation (m) on one strand. Removal of the pyrimidine dimer opposite the mutant base, followed by accurate replication during gap filling generates the two-strand mutation. (C) In Model 3, a single lesion is generated and subsequently removed by NER. Error-prone repair of the gap results in introduction of a mutation and a nick on the template strand. After expansion of the nick into a gap, repair results in a two-strand mutation.
Model 2, similar to that suggested by Kozmin and Jinks-Robertson (22) is shown in Fig. 6B. This model requires that two UV-induced lesions are located close together but on opposite strands. The first lesion is recognized and removed leaving a gap that is filled in by error-prone repair catalyzed by Pol zeta, resulting in a mutation on one strand. The second lesion is removed leaving a gap that overlaps with the position of the mutant base. Accurate repair of that gap would result in a TSM. This model is supported by the observations that efficient production of the TSMs requires nucleotide excision repair and DNA polymerase zeta but does not require mismatch repair. Since Model 2 requires two closely spaced lesions, one would expect that the proportion of two-stranded mutations would be a function of the square of the UV dose. In our experiments, the proportion of two-stranded mutations for the 20 J/m2 and 80 J/m2 were 0.85 and 0.90, respectively. Using doses of UV similar to those used in our study, Reynolds (32) found that closely apposed dimers occurred at frequencies that were proportional to UV dose. These observations are not consistent with our data and the model shown in Fig. 6B.
In Model 3 (Fig. 6C), the TSM is initiated by a single DNA lesion. Excision of this lesion and repair of the resulting gap by Pol zeta introduces a mutation and, in addition, a nick on the template strand. The resulting nick is expanded to a gap, and repair of that gap produces the TSM. Both Models 1 and 3 require events that have not yet been demonstrated: extensive single-stranded regions in G1-arrested cells (Model 1) and nicking of the template strand during repair (Model 3). Subsequent experiments will be needed to determine which model is correct.
One other mechanism that could mimic TSMs is that a one-strand mutation is generated in a G1/G0-arrested cell and this cell divides before mating with an unirradiated cell. We do not favor this explanation for two reasons. First, in several prior studies of G1/G0 irradiated yeast cells that do not involve mating between irradiated and unirradiated cells (20, 22), similar rates of TSMs are observed as in our study. Our second argument is based on the analysis of red/white sectors. These sectors are most simply explained as reflecting the first cell division of the diploid cell formed between one irradiated haploid and one unirradiated haploid (Fig. 1). The observation that cells from both the red sector and the white sector contain the same UV-induced mutation supports the model that the two-strand mutation is generated in the irradiated haploid as shown in Figs. 5B and 6.
Recombination Events Resulting from UV Treatment of G1-Arrested Cells.
As expected from our previous study (7), most recombination events induced by UV-treatment of G1-arrested cells have the patterns of LOH consistent with the formation of DSBs breaks in G1. However, as in our previous study, about one-third of the events are consistent with a DSB in S or G2, consistent with replication of a nicked DNA strand.
Both the 4:0 conversions and the 3:1/4:0 hybrid conversions are likely the result of repair of G1-initiated DSB (Fig. 1 D and E). By this model, the 4:0 events represent the repair of both DSBs by conversion events in which the two broken chromosomes duplicate the same amount of DNA from the donor chromosomes. 4:0 events were about half as frequent as 3:1/4:0 hybrid events (Table 2). As discussed previously, one explanation of the 4:0 events is that they represent repair of two broken chromosomes in which the repair event involves the same extent of DNA synthesis following strand invasion (depicted in Fig. 1D and SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). An alternative possibility is that 4:0 events are produced by repair of a single DSB in G1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S7F). Since such events reflect the repair on one DSB, followed by DNA replication, the conversion events would always be 4:0. Although we cannot definitely rule out either of these models, we prefer the second alternative (that repair is completed before DNA replication), since the UV-induced conversion tracts have a median size (5 kb, ref. 7) that is much larger than the average distance between heterozygous SNPs (less than 500 bp). If the two DSBs are processed independently, it is not clear why the conversion tracts would often share the same end points. The possibility that DSB repair is often completed in G1 is also consistent with the observation of double BIR events with the same breakpoints (SI Appendix, Fig. S7D).
Importance of UV-Induced Mutagenesis in Nondividing Cells.
Although, to our knowledge, there are no measurements of the fraction of dividing and nondividing yeast cells in nature, most yeast cells must be nondividing. Consequently, since exposure to UV produced by the sun is constant, almost all mutagenesis in nature is likely generated by the mechanisms that we have described for G1-arrested cells that produce two-strand mutations. It should be pointed out that our studies were performed with yeast cells arrested in G1 for about 4 h, whereas those examined by Kozmin and Jinks-Robertson (22) were G0 cells (stationary phase). Despite these differences in technique, the fractions of TSMs were similar in the two studies and, therefore, UV-induced mutagenesis in G1 and G0 cells is likely very similar. In addition to UV-induced mutations, uninduced mutations are common in nondividing yeast and bacteria (for example, refs. 33–35). Finally, it is also clear that sunlight contributes substantially to the mutations and other chromosome alterations that lead to melanomas and other types of skin cancers in humans (36), and it is likely that most of these alterations are generated in nondividing cells.
Materials and Methods
Yeast Strains.
Both the YZ1 and YZ2 diploids were derived from crosses of haploids in the W303 genetic background with haploids in the YJM789 genetic background and are heterozygous for approximately 55,000 SNPs (37). The YZ1 diploid was generated by a cross of the irradiated haploid KO171 (MATa can1-100 trp1-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 ura3-Δ::loxP-kanMX-loxP IV1495420::loxP-URA3Kl-loxP) with the unirradiated haploid KO124 (MATα ade2Δ::kanMX ura3 ho::hisG gal2 IV1495420::ADE2); the construction of these haploids is described in O’Connell et al. (30). The YZ2 diploid was formed by a cross of the irradiated haploid Wspo11 (MATa leu2-3,112 his3-11,15 ura3-1 ade2-1 trp1-1 can1-100 RAD5 spo11::KanMX) with the unirradiated haploid SY166 (MATα ade2-1 ura3 gal2 ho::hisG IV1510386::SUP4-o spo11::loxp). Wspo11 was previously described (23); SY166 is isogenic with Yspo11 (23) except for loss of the KanMX drug resistance marker by recombination between loxP sites flanking the marker.
Induction of Genomic Alterations by UV.
Two different protocols were used to examine the effects of UV treatment on genomic alterations. Cells were grown at 30 °C. for all experiments. For YZ1 and YZ2, we mated irradiated haploids to unirradiated haploids (details below). In the experiments with YZ1, the KO171-1 haploid was synchronized in G1. The synchronization utilized cells grown to a final concentration of 2 ×ばつ 106/mL in rich growth medium (YPD). The cells were then harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 5 mL of YPD (pH = 3.8) and incubated with a concentration of 5 μL of alpha factor (Sigma-Aldrich). After 90 min of incubation on a roller drum, the cells were washed twice with water and resuspended in 5 mL of water; at this point, greater than 90% of the cells were unbudded. These cells were plated onto solid YPD medium, and treated with 20 and 80 J/m2 of UVC (TL-2000 UV Translinker) in a darkened room. These cells were then immediately overlaid with a suspension of the KO124 strain. The plates were covered with foil to prevent removal of DNA damage by photoreactivation, and incubated for 4 h. The cells were then replica-plated to SD-minimal medium (38) to select for diploids and incubated for 2 d. We purified single colonies of the resulting diploids for sequencing analysis as described below. As a control, we also analyzed several isogenic diploids (YZ1-0) formed between unirradiated KO171 and KO124.
In an experiment similar to those that produced the YZ1 diploids, we UV-treated the haploid Wspo11 and mated it to the unirradiated haploid SY166 using the procedure described above. Diploids were selected using a medium that lacked histidine and contained 200 mg/L geneticin. On this medium, diploids that underwent a mitotic crossover in the first cell division following mating formed a red/white sectored colony. For DNA sequence analysis, we used cells purified from both red and white sectors.
DNA Sequence Analysis.
Whole genome sequencing was performed on BGI platforms using a 150-bp paired-end strategy. Raw reads were aligned to the reference genome of S288c using BWA (39), and the resulting alignments were processed with Samtools (40) for format conversion, sorting, and indexing. VarScan (41) was subsequently used to identify mutations based on read depth across the genome. Additional details of data analysis were described in our previous study (23). The raw sequencing data have been uploaded to the SRA database as described below.
Supplementary Material
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Dataset S02 (XLSX)
Dataset S03 (XLSX)
Dataset S04 (XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Gordenin, M. Kupiec, and S. Kozmin for comments on the manuscript, and S. Jinks-Robertson, A. Sancar, and D. Greig for useful suggestions. This study was supported by the grants from the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2023YFE0124700), National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LZ24C010002 and LDT23D06022D06), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (32270086 and 32170078), and seed funding from the Ocean University of Zhejiang University to D.-Q.Z., and the NIH (R35GM118020) to T.D.P.
Author contributions
Y.-X.Z., D.-Q.Z., and T.D.P. designed research; Y.-X.Z. performed research; Y.-X.Z., K.-J.L., M.H., K.Z., D.-Q.Z., and T.D.P. analyzed data; and Y.-X.Z., D.-Q.Z., and T.D.P. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
Reviewers: M.K., Tel Aviv University; and A.M., University of Texas Health San Antonio.
Contributor Information
Ying-Xuan Zhu, Email: zhengdaoqiong@zju.edu.cn.
Thomas D. Petes, Email: tom.petes@duke.edu.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The data are on a publicly available Website. The raw sequencing data have been uploaded to the SRA database (42), with the accession number PRJNA1249510.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Esposito M. S., Wagstaff J. E., "Mechanisms of mitotic recombination" in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, Strathern J., Jones E. W., Broach J. R., Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1981), pp. 341–370. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haynes R. H., Kunz B. A., "DNA repair and mutagenesis in yeast" in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, Strathern J., Jones E. W., Broach J. R., Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1981), pp. 371–414. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fabre F., Roman H., Genetic evidence for inducibility of recombination competence in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 1667–1671 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Friedberg E. C., et al. , DNA Repair and Mutagenesis (ASM Press, 2006). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Galli A., Schiestl R. H., Cell division transforms mutagenic lesions into deletion-recombinogenic lesions in yeast cells. Mutat. Res. 429, 13–26 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kimble M. T., et al. , Repair of replication-dependent double-strand breaks differs between the leading and lagging strands. Mol. Cell 85, 1–17 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yin Y., Petes T. D., Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of UV-induced mitotic recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003894 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alexander J. L., Orr-Weaver T. L., Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication. Genes Dev. 30, 2241–2252 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nakai S., Mortimer R. K., Studies of the genetic mechanism of radiation-induced mitotic recombination in yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 103, 329–338 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.St. Charles J. S., Petes T. D., High-resolution mapping of spontaneous mitotic recombination hotspots on the 1.1 Mb arm of yeast chromosome IV. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003434 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kupiec M., Damage-induced recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451, 81–105 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W., The double-strand-break model of recombination. Cell 33, 25–35 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pâques F., Haber J. E., Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 349–404 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fikus M. U., et al. , The product of the DNA damage-inducible gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DIN7, specifically functions in mitochondria. Genetics 154, 73–81 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Silberman R., Kupiec M., Plasmid-mediated induction of recombination in yeast. Genetics 137, 41–48 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Armstrong J. D., Kunz B. A., Site and strand specificity of UVB mutagenesis in the SUP4-o gene of yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 9005–9009 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brash D. E., UV signature mutations. Photochem. Photobiol. 91, 15–26 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Long L. J., et al. , Regulation of UV damage repair in quiescent yeast cells. DNA Repair 90, 102861 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lawrence C. W., Maher V. M., Mutagenesis in eukaryotes dependent on DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1p. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356, 41–46 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ekhardt F., Haynes R. H., Induction of pure and sectored mutant clones in excision-proficient and deficient strains of yeast. Mutat. Res. 43, 327–338 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.James A. P., Kilby B. J., The timing of UV mutagenesis in yeast: A pedigree analysis of induced recessive mutation. Genetics 87, 237–248 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kozmin S. G., Jinks-Robertson S., Mechanism of nucleotide excision repair-mediated UV-induced mutagenesis in nonproliferating cells. Genetics 193, 803–817 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sui Y., et al. , Genome-wide mapping of spontaneous genetic alterations in diploid yeast cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 228191–228200 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mieczkowski P. A., Lemoine F. J., Petes T. D., Recombination between retrotransposons as a source of chromosome rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 5, 1010–1020 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Song W., Petes T. D., Haploidization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by a deficiency in homologous recombination. Genetics 191, 279–284 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zheng D. Q., Petes T. D., Genome instability induced by low levels of replicative DNA polymerases. Genes 9, 539–559 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vanderberg B. N., et al. , Contributions of replicative and translesion DNA polymerases to mutagenic bypass of canonical and atypical UV photoproducts. Nat. Commun. 14, 2576–2586 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lawrence C. W., Christensen R. B., The mechanism of untargeted mutagenesis in UV-treated yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 186, 1–9 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu L., Malkova A., Break-induced replication: Unraveling each step. Trends Genet. 38, 752–765 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.O’Connell K., Jinks-Robertson S., Petes T. D., Elevated genome-wide instability in yeast mutants lacking RNase H activity. Genetics 201, 963–975 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burch L. H., et al. , Damage-induced localized hypermutability. Cell Cycle 10, 1073–1085 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reynolds R. J., Induction and repair of closely opposed pyrimidine dimers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 184, 197–207 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Steele D. F., Jinks-Robertson S., An examination of adaptive reversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132, 9–21 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neil A. J., et al. , Replication-independent instability of Friedreich’s ataxia GAA repeats during chronological aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e213080118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foster P. L., Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 373–397 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Saini N., et al. , UV-exposure, endogenous DNA damage, and DNA replication errors shape the spectra of genome changes in human skin. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009302 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee P. S., et al. , Fine-structure map of spontaneous mitotic crossovers in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000410 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sherman F., Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 350, 3–41 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li H., Durbin R., Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li H., et al. , The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Koboldt D. C., et al. , VarScan: Variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics 28, 2283–2285 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhu Y.-X., et al. , Bioproject: Saccharomyces cerevisiae raw sequence reads. National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1249510. Deposited 11 April 2025.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Dataset S02 (XLSX)
Dataset S03 (XLSX)
Dataset S04 (XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
The data are on a publicly available Website. The raw sequencing data have been uploaded to the SRA database (42), with the accession number PRJNA1249510.