On 2015年3月11日 22:20:58 +0000 Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're ignoring that it's not maintained,
According to which metric/criterion? changeset: 94932:86c9ef950288 user: Steve Dower <[email protected]> date: Tue Mar 10 09:56:38 2015 -0700 summary: Issue #23606: Disable ctypes.util.find_library("c") on Windows so tests are skipped while we figure out how best to approach the CRT change changeset: 94756:7c6e3358221a user: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> date: Thu Feb 26 15:27:57 2015 +0200 summary: Silenced minor GCC warnings. changeset: 94653:a84ae2ccd220 user: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> date: Mon Feb 16 20:52:17 2015 +0200 summary: Issue #23450: Fixed possible integer overflows. [etc.] > Who knows what > improvements, bugfixes, etc. exist upstream in libffi that we lack because > no one wants to go through and figure it out. Well, who knows? How about you enlighten us about that? And why do you think cffi, which *also* requires libffi, would be better served in that regard? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com