Re: [Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015年1月06日 12:44:42 -0800

There's an obligatory XKCD reference for this: http://xkcd.com/1172/ 
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> More context:
>>
>> 2014年12月19日 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121
>>>
>>
>> The link mentions the following changeset:
>> ---
>> changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2
>> branch: 2.7
>> parent: 93112:927cca0b9337
>> user: R David Murray <[email protected]>
>> date: Fri Oct 17 20:07:08 2014 -0400
>> files: Lib/argparse.py Lib/test/test_argparse.py Misc/NEWS
>> description:
>> #9351: set_defaults on subparser is no longer ignored if set on parent.
>>
>> Before, if a default was set on the parent parser, any default for that
>> variable set via set_defaults on a subparser would be ignored. Now
>> the subparser set_defaults is honored.
>>
>> Patch by Jyrki Pullianinen.
>>
>>
>> diff -r 927cca0b9337 -r 1a3143752db2 Lib/argparse.py
>> --- a/Lib/argparse.py Fri Oct 17 16:20:15 2014 -0500
>> +++ b/Lib/argparse.py Fri Oct 17 20:07:08 2014 -0400
>> @@ -1089,7 +1089,14 @@ class _SubParsersAction(Action):
>> # parse all the remaining options into the namespace
>> # store any unrecognized options on the object, so that the top
>> # level parser can decide what to do with them
>> - namespace, arg_strings = parser.parse_known_args(arg_strings,
>> namespace)
>> +
>> + # In case this subparser defines new defaults, we parse them
>> + # in a new namespace object and then update the original
>> + # namespace for the relevant parts.
>> + subnamespace, arg_strings = parser.parse_known_args(arg_strings,
>> None)
>> + for key, value in vars(subnamespace).items():
>> + setattr(namespace, key, value)
>> +
>> if arg_strings:
>> vars(namespace).setdefault(_UNRECOGNIZED_ARGS_ATTR, [])
>> getattr(namespace, _UNRECOGNIZED_ARGS_ATTR).
>> extend(arg_strings)
>> ---
>>
>> Which is related to http://bugs.python.org/issue9351
>>
>> Maybe argparse just became more strict? I don't understand the issue.
>>
>
> Steven Bethard, the argparse maintainer, defined the old behavior of
> ignoring subparser defaults (where there are also top level defaults) as a
> bug "counter to what people probably expect". If the old behavior had been
> documented, changing it in a bug-fix release would have been a mistake.
> But looking at the patch, the doc seems to have been silent on the issue.
>
> This is not the first time someone considered a 'bug fix' to be a
> 'regression', which it might be from their viewpoint. The last comment on
> the github thread suggests that an easy fix was found.
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> guido%40python.org
>
-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to